Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcusCalion
Should we include something along the lines of 'It was called the Nauglamír, the Necklace of the Dwarves.' just so we formally name the necklace. As it is, it seems a little awkward to me.
|
Oh, I see - we somehow never name the necklace when it first appears. I would have no real objection to adding something like what you suggest. Though if it is not named when first made in the LT text, perhaps we should leave it that way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gondowe
I came to this thread after have went for an updating in my structure.
I had readed this note from CT when read Beren and Luthien, but I think my mind didn't want to assume.
The main thing is to assume that there is an unpublished text that CT never showed us.
If this is assumed, so we MUST change things in our texts.
|
Yes, but I think the two main issues are:
1. Christopher Tolkien doesn't tell us what this presumed text says or when it dates from.
2. The statement in
Beren and Luthien appears to contradict what Christopher Tolkien said in HoMe XI.
1 means that even if we wanted to follow this text, we would not know exactly how to implement it, other than lifting text directly from
QS77. 2 means that at some point, either in HoMe XI or in
Beren and Luthien, CT apparently made a mistaken statement about this. What he says in HoMe XI is backed up by the texts given there. The fact that we have in B&L only this one mention of a text otherwise uncited suggests that it's at least possible that CT was mistaken in his statement there.
In the end, I just think that this one contradictory statement is awfully shaky ground on which to make such a major change.