Do you mean these?
Quote:
|
CONCLUSION FOR THE MOMENT: He might be a good lynch target…but for the time being I’d really rather not…and I will get to why in a minute.
|
Indeed. You said much the same about
Lalaith -
Quote:
|
CONCLUSION: She might be a wolf. Not sure she’s the best lynch target, but she definitely might be a wolf.
|
- and
Lommy -
Quote:
|
CONCLUSION: Unsure. Could well be a wolf…but might not be.
|
- lots of "mights" there. In fact, I think your strongest candidate was, well -
Quote:
|
CONCLUSION: I might be completely off base on this one. I admit that, and am certainly open to discussion and persuasion on this, but out of all the players in the game right now, I feel worst about him.
|
- me.
When it came down to
Inzil versus
Lalaith, though -
Quote:
Make no mistake about it, I do not trust Inzil. He may very well be bad and we may need to eject him.
However, of the realistic candidates on offer, I feel worse about ++Lalaith.
Sorry, Lalaith. You know I love you.
|
I'd almost argue you seem to have felt worse about
Inzil earlier - it's a bit hard to tell, though, with all the "mights" floating around. However, at the time you quasi-voted, the votes stood thusly -
Quote:
Loslote=>Lalaith
Zil=>Lalaith
Lommy=>Inzil
Legate=>Inzil
|
- with
Lalaith,
Boro, and myself to vote.
Lalaith could obviously be expected to vote for
Inzil in self-preservation, and
Boro abstained (eyebrow-raising; I'd have expected him to care more, I suppose). In any case, it's an interesting tie to have made; your vote kept the votes tied for as long as possible, and you made it fairly plain in your post that you'd be fine with
Lalaith or Inzil. It seems disingenuous that you'd then try to use that as evidence today that you
didn't want
Inzil lynched.