Quote:
|
We may have discussed this elsewhere and it slipped my mind, but shouldn't it be Amras who is alive in Beleriand and Amrod who died at Losgar?
|
It seems discussed here a bit...
http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showthread.php?t=4479
I'm not a member of this Silmarillion project, but as a fan of Tolkien's nomenclature I'll give this a go: Ambarto becomes the youngest or 'last' child, thus matching up better with Telufinwe 'Last Finwë' (though this was not specifically marked it appears).
Quote:
|
Amros (1) Sindarin for Ambarussa. Had Amros (2) Ambarto lived, it [i.e. the name Ambarto] would probably have been [Sindarized] as Amrod, but when [?encountered] at all in Sindarin form it was [?] Amarthan Fated One. S. ambart- > ammarth, amarth fate = Umbarto.' Vinyar Tengwar 41
|
In the revised scenario where one of the sons dies, in my opinion there is really no one named
Amras or
Amrod. Or to put it another way, we would now have Amros and Amrod if the latter had lived... but as he didn't we have
Amros and
Amarthan, as in Tolkien's list published in VT.
Quote:
|
Maedros, Maglor, Celegorm, Curufin, Caranthir, Amros, Amarthan.
|