|
Note, this is not about what it may or may not contain, it's about the 'ethics' of making such a film, about if it's a good idea or not.
For me, it's not a film I'm looking forwards to seeing at all. Unlike The Hobbit (even if it does turn out to feature a Greek chorus of eructating Dwarves) which I will certainly go and see.
It's odd. I lapped up the merchandise produced for the LotR films, even the dodgy content of books like Weapons & Warfare was something I could skim over just for the sheer fun of it all. It was all based on characters I loved, in situations I'd read about, in places I quite fancied visiting. An adventure. But I'm quite the opposite about the 'bridge' film. It feels like treading on Tolkien's grave somehow.
There isn't that sense of seeing a much-loved story brought to life.
Do we want to see Tolkien's stories on screen or just see more of Legolas and Galadriel like they're soap characters?
I'd be interested to know if anything similar has worked?
__________________
Gordon's alive!
|