|
The case against Lal seems pretty weak...I mean to me it seems based off not a very good track record of voting, but when you're flying blind I'd be suspicious of anyone who had a squeaky clean voting record.
A wolf isn't flying blind, but they have to manufacture a case of suspicion against innocents. Often times blind innocents make their own mistakes in voting that wolves jump on. Lal's voting record isn't good, but her reasoning for her votes look genuine. Better than some of my reasoning anyway, and better than Pitch's.
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|