This one makes me crazy as I'm not sure whether I should agree with it or think of
Form being the suspicious one here:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Formendacil
So this leaves me with the following: Brinn either saw something genuinely suspicious in Nienna--which I must admit I don't see at all--or else you had a different reason for killing her? A wolf saving a cobbler? A cobbler saving a wolf?
Conclusion? Brinn is moderately suspicious.
|
Somehow I'm bending more into believing
Brinn - she tends to play with a set of "values" as I do. These include wishing to treat old-timers coming back to the fray from a long time more leniently (like newbies) on Day1 - or not wishing to lynch the kind of "strong players" on Day1 - if there is not a reason to actually think them guilty (here we differed on Day1 one: I thought there was a reason to believe
Kuru was not on the good side, she didn't).
The thing that makes me look at this post by
Form suspiciously is the bolded part of it. The moral highground of after-wisdom!
I need to look at
Form a bit more as I'm afraid some of these suspicions may stem from just the fact that we differ on many things in this game and it's easy to read disagreement as suspicious if one is not careful enough. And he makes good points as well, to be sure.
The wolves are also perfectly cabable of doing it though.
EDIT X'd with Greenie x2 - oh great!