Boro and
Lommy mentioned checking
Mira, but I actually think that would be rather misleading, since the decision to lynch
Mira was influenced by the whole debate of double-lynch-vs.-lynching-doomed-person - a debate that isn't really resolved, as far as I can tell. I know I voted for
Mira in good faith and innocently, and that had nothing to do with what her role was, which could very well be the case for others who voted for her,. If she is innocent (which I think she probably is) double-lynching her looks like a tactic for the aggressors to go after those who voted for her , who could well be innocent too. In fact, if we do double lynch her and she turns out innocent (or even cobbler),
Boro and
Lommy will become more suspicious in my eyes for that reason.
On the other hand, if she' did turn out to be an aggressor, it wouldn't tell us much of use either. The other aggressors wouldn't have much cause to have argued strongly against lynching her, since they were going to lose her anyway, but they also probably would have preferred to see an innocent lynched as well.
I still think the time isn't yet ripe for double-lynching.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
Well, at the risk of being Quartermaster Dumb, why?
|
I think he meant that
Gwath wouldn't have encouraged suspicion towards my reveal if he had been a wolf with
Sally, since it might have put her in danger? It doesn't really make sense, though, since it's not likely I would have been lynched after my reveal, regardless of
Gwath's,
Izzy's, and
Inzil's suspicions. I'd ask him, but he's making pancakes at the moment.
