I don't know if it's a good idea to go interviewing those on the list with no evidence to go on...too much of a risk of antagonizing someone who has no real ill-will towards anyone. I think Firefoot said much the same thing. How can we manage using the list without violating an "innocent until proven guilty" principle?
I should think that it would only mean that evidence given could be compared against such a shortlist.
__________________
<=== Lookee, lookee, lots of IM handles!
|