Quote:
|
Unless something dramatically changes in the next few hours, I want Kuru for rep.
|
Now why would you say that? It's evidently clear that
Lottie is innocent -
Kuru is probably innocent but there is a scenario where he could be guilty. So why choose
Kuru over
Lottie?
(The scenario where
Kuru could be guilty is as follows: desperate wolves would be needing to replace known innocent
Lottie with one of their own - how would they do this? Well, once
Lottie was finally out of the way, the next 'survivor' would take her place - thus having a conspirator controlling the lynching. It would be possible to stage-manage by simply not breathing on anyone on Night 2 and then having
Kuruwolf claiming to be sick).
No, I'm not putting anyone in the known innocent pile other than
Lottie and myself. I do think
Zil was probably a wolf. I think
Boro, Lommy, Legate and [B]
Shasta could be wolves. And think even
Kuru, far-fetched as it might be, could be a wolf. He has been so adamant about
Legate being innocent because of the no-lynching plan, but what if that had been hatched as a wolfy plan to keep the conspirators safe until night-kills put them in the majority to control lynchings? It doesn't seem to have worked out that way, what with
Lottie being such a great survivor. But that doesn't mean I'm giving
Legate a clean bill of health.
(Thought - if
Legate and
Kuru turn out to be wolves they will have played with such wily elegance that frankly they deserve to win)