I had a long post ready to go and the browser froze.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lari
are we sure that Nog's death wasn't in some way a way to implicate Fea? Can we really rule out a possible innocent Fea and really good wolves/wraiths?
|
No.
Fea implicated herself. They would have had to be really,
really good wraiths to force
Fea to start a crazy bandwagon minutes before deadline. That has nothing to do with
Nog's death.
Lari's pretty high on my list of suspects now.
As I thought, I don't buy
Fea's explanations at all. I find it especially bizarre that she cites fear of being lynched as a reason. No one was talking about lynching her until
after she made her strange attack on
Dury, and even then, there was really no movement to lynch her. She's latching onto
Rune's misguided impression here to try to explain herself, I guess. Won't work.
As for protecting
Mac, since when was she so worried about him - worried enough to incriminate herself and those who followed her and lynch
Dury with little (rather, no) reason? Besides, she claims she didn't expect anyone to follow her vote, so how was she saving herself or
Mac anyway?
Now, I understand voting for a non-participant because you don't want to lynch the big names whose heads are on the block. I've done that myself.
Fea, however, actively furthered the impression there was merit in
Nog's accusations, and behaved as though starting a bandwagon was her goal. Her actions were blatently cobblerish (or suicidal-wolfish).
It's time I put my money where my mouth is. I'm rarely so sure of someone's guilt, and I don't want to take a chance on lynching another innocent toDay when a baddie has basically turned herself in.
If it were someone other than
Fea, I'd say keep her around for now as a "known cobbler" and go after her partners in crime. However, I've seen how
Fea can mislead a village, and I don't feel like standing around and witnessing another example of it.
++Fea
And now I'll focus on other people. Talking only about
Fea, after all, would waste the Day.