Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pitch
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by me
The second thing that bothered me there early on was him accusing both Rikae and Eönwë piling onto easy suspicion (the Legate - Zil thingy) when looking at their posts that clearly isn't the case.
|
Isn't it?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rikae #27
I agree with Legate on the importance of simply starting conversation [...] In that vein, I don't much care for Inzil and Bom's empty posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Eönwë #31
Ok, what I don't like is how Inzil managed to change the discussion about the Acolyte into meta-discussion.
|
How would you describe what's going on here? |
I'd describe them just as what they stand for.
So,
Rikae is saying that
Legate is right in stating that there should be conversation (defending the Acolyte discussion), and that she disagrees with the way
Zil & Bom post empty posts (aka posts that don't get us any further, I guess?)
Eönwë is saying that he doesn't like the way
Zil turned the Acolyte discussion into a meta discussion - whether that is true or false as I'm not sure it was
Zil (or him alone) who turned the discussion off the Acolyte (or whether it was bad that Acolyte discussion finally ended).
But "piling onto easy suspicion in the
Legate - Inzil case"? Nope.
To me those doing it are the ones who jump on it (the "controversy" between the two) and parrot things like "that is the interesting thing toDay" - implying that we should concentrate on them. That's "piling up" for me. Pointing at that discusiion as being the one to pay heed to (while ignoring other possibilities).
Some did do that, but I think not
Rikae or
Eönwë.