So, what we have here.
Shasta is obviously off my radar at the moment.
I don't want to vote for
the phantom - partially because this is a very useful system and I can't see how it would work pro-KM and partially because I don't like voting amusing/interesting/loud players on the first Day.
Everyone else... yeah.
It seems to me there are a couple of people who have in general only been slightly confused:
Brin, to a degree
Morsul. Convincing enough in their innocent baffledness so I don't want to vote for them now.
Boro: I'm not any better in this than usual, but he brings up and elaborates good points and thus I'm reluctant to look at him today. The only confusing thing is his big opposition against the pretty harmless lists.
Sally: hasn't been around enough for me to have anything to say about her.
Eonwe: my gut-feeling of him is not bad, if not good. Some good analysis on the reveals and chains and such. Nothing to make him lean to the negative side too much.
Eomer: Brings up the 'if we'd not lynch anyone', which is always a bit creepy. Apart from that doesn't really do much- tries to find loopholes in
phantom's plan (but don't we all?). I think he's leaning towards negative in my chart, but not by much.
Lottie: Can't say much. Neutral so far.
Manwe: Brings up a couple of points, but forgets the ranger so they are a bit irrelevant. Would a baddie forget the ranger? Or act as if he had? Neutral so far.
I'd say the ones I feel worst about are
Inzil and
Nerwen.
Nerwen comments smart points but mainly points out other people's mistakes, miscalculations or rules. Makes her seem sharp without any comment on the actual gaming and decisionmaking.
Inzil seems to me slightly more confused than normal, as well as more - explanatory. When we were giving counterarguments to her loophole-hunt, she was quick to make sure we knew she wasn't actually against it, just
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inziladun
All right. I'm just looking for holes in this deal, before everyone just jumps in.
|
and
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inziladun
Well, I didn't say the possibility of a fake reveal should prevent the plan, it was just a thought I had.
|
Which is true, but that's what we were all doing - throwing ideas forth and back. No need to explain your actions there.
I'll say the normal day 1 "These are obviously no serious suspicions, we don't have enough material etc etc" and vote for
++Inzil. The couple of quotes and gut feeling are enough to make me feel uncomfortable at this time of Day 1, and I cannot stay for longer.