Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivriniel
William, ur comment seems to imply that a poster can only comment if they have the authority to. By drawing upon, only, and singularly ideas in tomes you aspire to, value or respect.
I do not have any problem with your referencing or materials. what I do post, however, is what I post.
Please have a look at the materials, and see -- if you like -- what perhaps would help me to steer you in my ideas, by asking a question about a concept, or directing my attention to where it is that you would like it to be.
Thank you and kind regards
|
I don't think William implied that only people with authority should comment; however, he is completely correct in what he is saying and offers research to back it up. That is how debates are won.
Simply put, the One Ring of
The Lord of the Rings was not originally the ring Bilbo bore in
The Hobbit, and the idea by Tolkien to incorporate that plot point into the story came well after the original publication of
The Hobbit. Please reread William's post for the particulars.
But one doesn't even need to go to outlandish lengths and provide copious amounts of documentation to know this. All one has to do is read the first edition of
The Hobbit to know that, after the riddle game, Gollum simply hands the magic ring to Bilbo as a reward for winning. This, of course, would not be physically possible for Gollum if it were the malignant One Ring he had held for centuries. Tolkien did not change that aspect of the story until he rewrote
The Hobbit to align with the plot of
Lord of the Rings.
If you have no conclusive citations that state otherwise, the debate is over, nothing more to see here, move on.