Quote:
Originally Posted by Brinniel
If you had seen me in other games, you'd know that I typically like to keep alive players who are newbies, infrequent players, or someone who tends to get Day 1 lynched often for the first Day or two. To me, it's a matter of fairness. It can be more frustrating as first time player, someone who hasn't played in a long time, or someone who always dies early compared to a regular to hardly play before getting killed, especially as a Day One lynch when reasoning behind suspicion isn't all that strong. WW is supposed to be fun and sometimes that situation takes out the fun and discourages the player from joining another game. I've seen it happen before.
|
I'm somewhat concerned that I find myself agreeing with
Kent again... always a bad sign when someone seems to think the way you do in this game... but I'm also not buying this completely. Sorry,
Brinn.
My difficulty here is that you voted for
Nienna... who was admittedly not the most newbie nor the most silent person present yesterDay, but she had a good smattering of both. Now, I suppose it's possible that you saw/see
Nienna as a toughened battle-veteran of WW, and given the amount of noise being made yesterday, I suppose she was in the noisy part of the pack... but still... I'm not entirely convinced.
It seems to me by your reasoning,
Kuru would have been a more logical vote than
Nienna. He was an old player, he'd done a lot of talking...
What's more, your vote for
Nienna was decisive. Granted, you couldn't KNOW you were the final vote (three minutes before the deadline is early for a last vote, by the standards of some games), but you certainly knew you were putting
Nienna into contention.
So this leaves me with the following:
Brinn either saw something genuinely suspicious in
Nienna--which I must admit I don't see at all--or else you had a different reason for killing her? A wolf saving a cobbler? A cobbler saving a wolf?
Conclusion?
Brinn is moderately suspicious.