|
LEANING INNOCENT:
Boromir88 - Seems innocentish to me.
Eomer - Makes very good points. I felt like applauding on reading his post about Nog and Roa. As has been said, making sense should not automatically point to innocence, but this far I have nothing at all that would point the other way.
Brinn - I like what I've seen this far.
Pitchwife - Likewise.
Macalaure - Not suspicious.
Lommy - Seems genuine and makes sense.
NEITHER OR BOTH:
Inziladun - No idea.
Loslote - No idea.
Nienna - No idea.
sally - Too little data to judge her by.
Nerwen - I'm very unconvinced either way.
Roa - Aaargh. Her points on Nogrod seem a bit flawed, then again Nog really is acting oddly and I can't really blame Roa for getting suspicious of him if she is innocent. Lommy's idea of the two of them being wolves together is interesting but I'm not sure if it isn't too easy - actually, a wolf-Lommy would love to create an idea like that - and then again, Lommy gives me very innocent vibes - (WW-headache, here I come.)
Bes - Too little data.
Shasta - Deep under my radar.
wilwa - Hasn't posted.
tromkehra - Too little data.
WARY OF:
Mnemosyne - A slight beep on my radar. I'll check her if I have time. There's something in her tone and her way of popping in and being kind of active but not rubbing anyone the wrong way that I don't like.
Morsul - His vote was very ill-reasoned in my opinion. Of course it is Day 1 and he had to vote early, but I didn't like it.
Nogrod - Enough said, I think.
EDIT: x-ed since my last
__________________
"But some stories, small, simple ones about setting out on adventures or people doing wonders, tales of miracles and monsters, have outlasted all the people who told them, and some of them have outlasted the lands in which they were created."
|