Okay, first things first. I think we should make sure to figure out the communication with Dead Thread ASAP now, otherwise they won't have even remote chance to communicating anything. As soon as we can get that off the table, we can focus more on
Lommy's death and on the lynch yesterDay.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
As I said, I think we should stipulate that the Dead should check lynchees only (except in the case of a Hunter kill). The idea being floated about yesterDay that the wolves might kill one of their own just to have a wolf in the Dead Thread... well, it could happen as a sort of extreme outlier, but I feel that planning around such a possibility means that half the information we get from the Dead will be effectively useless. What do other people think?
|
I don't think it is very likely either. The only thing that might be a problem, and that is actually an important point, what
Brinn said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brinniel
Eonwe, now that I'm starting to wrap my head around your strategy, while I do like where you're going with it, I see flaws. For one thing, last Night there were two in the Dead Thread which means they could vote to reveal a role. How do we know for sure that they cooperated and allowed this to happen? And if they did, how do we know if the role revealed was Morsul or Inzil? The theory of the EW killing their own wolf seems out there, yet the mere fact that it was discussed yesterDay may have prompted last Night's vote to go towards Morsul.
|
That's a valid note. If we go with the option of a list for communicating, I think it should be enough if the list has some built-in failsafes, including a "none of the above" option.
In any case, the "two-answer list" such as the one that has been quoted from yesterDay wouldn't do, in my opinion. On top of everything, if potential Wolves on the Dead Thread managed to mess up with the vote, we would end up with completely the opposite information really easily (even though that's always a risk).
In any case, if I am thinking of a list, I say we should at least modify it to say, for instance, "none of the above". Ideally, split it into more parts, which should not be that big of a deal now (it would become more difficult once the Dead thread starts to fill up, but at least for toDay, I think that should work. We can always modify the lists later). In other words, we should bear in mind the possibilities of the Dead thread working differently than we want them to, take into account possible "civic disobedience" of the Dead thread and what have you.
So if, using
Eönwë's list modified for toDay, it was:
Quote:
Shastanis Althreduin
satansaloser2005
Pervinca Took
Nogrod
Nerwen
Mithalwen
Loslote
Legate of Amon Lanc
Lalaith
Eönwë
Eomer of the Rohirrim
Brinniel
Boromir88
|
Then, if we wanted to be super-sure and wanted to take into account the possibility that they somehow revealed
Morsul instead of
Inzil, we could make it something like first three -
Inzil is Prey, 4.-6. -
Inzil is Predator, 7.-8. -
Morsul is Prey, 9.-10. -
Morsul is Predator, 11.-13. none of the above. (These remaining numbers could be somehow modified still if we think of some more specific "none of the above".) Btw the number now is such that it is harder to divide, but I thought since the
Morsul option is really there rather "just to be sure", I gave it only range of two people and range of three to
Inzil. (We could also cut from the last option, but this is as even as possible and in any case no option should have just one person there.)
It's a draft, but I think it could work like that. At least for toDay. Again, our main goal should be to avoid chaos among the Dead.
I will leave this here to look at, and meanwhile I will try to look at what can be learned from
Lommy's death, and hopefully also the voting yesterDay.
EDIT: x-ed with
Nerwen,
Nogrod and
Eönwë