Quote:
I think that this could help with the problem of the Balrogs.
|
I'm not sure I understand. How does the quoted passage relate to Balrogs? Maybe I'm just missing something - it is 1:30 in the morning.
The Balrog problem, though, has largely been solved as far as the actual text of FoG goes.
Quote:
Was this addressed at some point before? This certainly conflicts with the account that Turgons was the tallest of the elves save Thingol.
|
Very observant! Perhaps this we should delete 'tallest of the Gnomes' - unless anyone can think of a way to retain the description of him as 'tall' without violating the principles.
Quote:
I'm of the idea of replacing the "Mechanical Monsters" with dragons.
|
So am I. This is the biggest issue left to be resolved. I think we should probably deal with that separately, apart from these individual changes (it does have its own thread somewhere . . .)
Quote:
Is the concept of fire drake acceptable or are they just dragons.
|
This goes with the dragon matter.
Quote:
And thus it was that the [dragons] of Melkor came upon Gondolin.
|
Quote:
Again, I think that serpents can be changed to dragons.
|
Even if we make all the dragons normal Glaurung-types, I don't think we should eliminate the terms 'serpent' and 'fire-serpent'. Certainly dragons are serpent-like, and certainly at least some of them have powers of fire. 'Serpent' is no worse a synonym than 'wyrm'.
Quote:
dragons of iron scales as suggested elsewhere.
|
Dragon matter again; I agree with you on this, though.
Probably seige engines rather than combustion engines (if I had to venture a guess).
Quote:
globlins of hatred? I know that the term is used in the Hobbit, but is it appropiate here?
|
In my opinion, it's very appropriate. 'Goblin' is, after all, used at least once or twice in LotR. I see nothing wrong with the word - in fact I rather like it as an alternate translation of
yrch.
Well . . . apparently. I'm not sure on this, but if Tolkien wrote it, I don't see why we should change it.
Quote:
I can live with this but a balrog with a bow?
I would have used instead a hosts of orcs with bows. I can't imagine a balrog with a bow.
|
This is a matter of some difficulty. I don't have a huge problem with a Balrog shooting a bow, but I am having doubts about specifying that one was killed by Rog's men. I will give this thought.
Quote:
Men? I would replace by, now the host of Melko was assembled.
|
Hmm. You may be right.
Quote:
Is Echtelion to remain the fairest of the Noldor?
|
I don't see why not.