|
Your analyses of the textual situation is perfect, but you conclusion is wrong.
To be clear: Your interpretation of the facts is as good as that of anyone else. But what we put into our text is not what we think that most like happend.
If we finde out that an issue is unsetteled by JRR Tolkien, we will not write any hint of what we think happend in our text. Instaed we have to write our text in a way that every possible solution will stay possible.
Ambivalent wirting is what we Need, not inovative writing.
Respectfuly
Findegil
|