![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Laconic Loreman
|
With Gothmog, nothing is known for sure, anyone's guess is as good as the next. Afterall he only gets this one sentence in The Lord of the Rings:
Quote:
The reason I don't think Gothmog was a Nazgul, I think TM has put it the best way. The Nazgul's lack of identity is a symbolic matter. Tolkien plays with this idea of the importance of 'names.' If you have a name, you have an identity, you have this sense of self and free will. If you have no name (or forget your name entirely) than there is no identity, you are completely controlled/have no free will. Prime example being the Nazgul, being slaves to Sauron...they lost names and their identity. Let's take Gollum...his name was Smeagol, however people soon labelled him Gollum because of the noises he made. He loses touch with Smeagol and becomes Gollum (as he becomes controlled by the Ring). As far as Tolkien calling one of his Nazgul 'Khamul.' There are a thing to consider. 'Khamul' was only mentioned in Unfinished Tales, no where else (and probably the important one - The Lord of the Rings) does the name 'Khamul' for one of the Nazgul show up. One quick comment here for Ninja: Quote:
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|