The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum


Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page

Go Back   The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum > The New Silmarillion > Translations from the Elvish - Public Forum
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-07-2000, 09:02 AM   #6
Saulotus
Shade of Carn Dûm
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 346
Saulotus has just left Hobbiton.
Ring

<font face="Verdana"><table><TR><TD><FONT SIZE="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Newly Deceased
Posts: 0
</TD><TD></TD></TR></TABLE>
Re: Literary devices

&gt;<img src=grin.gif ALT=">D"> isagree that we shouldn't add to the Silm.&lt;&lt;

Dude, I think ya misunderstood. Adding back in the finished sections like WOH is prolly fine. Extending it or anything else to create and include new dialogue so as to incorporate any sketched material is the naughtybad. Myself; I personally think a great use and added dimension to Numenor could be obtained from the use of ELENDIL AND HERENDIL IN NUMENOR from LOST ROAD with little to no editing (except 'Gnome' and stuff like that). Does it make it proper that this should go into the story? Depends. I agree on the delicate fashion part you state; and even posted the same thoughts myself. Can the trees be saved? Yup. Can it be done while keeping the story true to intent to Tolkien? Yup. Can even the lamps be saved? Yup. Does everything that was discarded have to remain discarded? Depends. It was discarded for a reason, adding it back would have to also have reason; other than 'Tolkien wrote it so it should go back in'. If the reason for the omission can be identified, and corrected within author's intent, then it could be argued that re-inclusion is warranted. THE HISTORY OF THE AKALLABETH is a good example of this. Christopher identifies and admits that for the SILMARILLION he accidentially used what he thought was the last version of Numenor's fall. He then gives insight to these missing pieces. Could those be added? Youbetcha. (Although I personally liked it written using Numenorean verbage, but that's a PERSONAL choice). This is not the same as going back over the text and editorially correcting passages to ENSURE the stipulation of Balrog wings or no Balrog wings (one example) or other PERSONAL choices (this is re-writing not editing). The only PERSONAL choices I would recommend are those from Tolkien himself.

</p>
Saulotus is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:42 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.