Literary Devices & such for Revised Silmarillion - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

Saulotus · 01-15-2001, 12:10 PM

<font face="Verdana"><table><TR><TD><FONT SIZE="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Shade of Carn Dûm
Posts: 380</TD><TD></TD></TR></TABLE>
Re: CRRT quota tion on editing

Thank you.

This has been my point with statements made in various threads.

IMO; keeping to the text as written, and avoiding material from 77 and otherplaces as much as possible is the best course.

I try to remind those who read the threads that not all of the material was present for his inspection, and that he did the best job he could (with what he had).

In this regard, 77 is no more canonical than the result this project would create, and in fact, this project may in the end have a more sound basis for a 'canon' standing than 77 does, if it is done properly.

</p>

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

01-15-2001, 12:10 PM	#30
Saulotus Shade of Carn Dûm Join Date: Sep 2000 Posts: 346	<font face="Verdana"><table><TR><TD><FONT SIZE="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Shade of Carn Dûm Posts: 380</TD><TD></TD></TR></TABLE> Re: CRRT quota tion on editing Thank you. This has been my point with statements made in various threads. IMO; keeping to the text as written, and avoiding material from 77 and otherplaces as much as possible is the best course. I try to remind those who read the threads that not all of the material was present for his inspection, and that he did the best job he could (with what he had). In this regard, 77 is no more canonical than the result this project would create, and in fact, this project may in the end have a more sound basis for a 'canon' standing than 77 does, if it is done properly. </p>