![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
FD-SL-19:
I treid to reread that discussion myself after I did the post, but could find not more in the **Ruin of Doriath - Pre-Revision speculation/proposal thread** than Aiwendils remark in post #54 Quote:
Quote:
Thus the discussion is a bit more open than I thought: Aiwendil put in some doubts, that I now try to dispel. If I succed with that I would bring in the following changes: Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
The Kinslayer
|
I'm ok with the new additions but I would use instead:
Quote:
I liked the addition from Unfinished Tales. Quote:
__________________
"Alas, poor Yorick! I knew him, Horatio; a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy." |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
RD-SL-20: If there is any doubt, then you are right, it's safer to drop it.
RD-SL-19: I think that Findegil is right; my reservation about the news of Mim's death was an overreaction. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Then this section is done and we can start with last section of chapter.
I will start that with some further changes that came lately to my attention. Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12
![]() |
I know that the discussion about this topic finished a long time ago, but I've started to post here because I am myself trying to reconstruct the structure of a "new" fall of Doriath.
So far I've managed to collect the narrative from the old tale and I'm processing it with the following operations: - Update of Names - Division in Chapters - Deletion of Major Inconsistencies - Integration with some parts of the Q30 I would be very glad to see your complete version before trying to post some comments on that topic. If that cannot be done...I'll try to discuss them without comparing our versions (if that doesn't represent a problem for you) Thanks, Emrys |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Hi Emrys,
have you read your Private Message? If not please do so. Seeing your interest my offer does include FoD from now on. We are of course interested to compare your ideas with our work and it would be much easier for us if you could make the comparision. Respectfully Findegil Last edited by Findegil; 11-07-2007 at 11:58 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12
![]() |
Probably you have already discussed all this matters for long, but, since I've started to make my own RoD before the discovery of your forum, I'll try to express my comments on this matter here.
Having partly read your version I'll start with some general comment on it. I don't know if this is in line with the philosophy of this project but I would have tried to preserve as much Tolkien text as possible so some questions: 1) Why Eliminating Ufedhin while reteaning the treacherous elves? To me the deletion of this character from the Quenta is just a matter of compression I would have retained him. 2) Why using parts of Sil77 Fall of Doriath since it does not contain any original tolkien text? As we know, Tolkien tried to replace the original tale of the Fall of Doriath many times but never found a solution to the problem that the girdle of Melian can't be passed by enemies. Nonetheless this tale represent the only complete text and it doesn't contraddict the latest scripts of Tolkien (TY) in any way with the exception of some minor changes (name changes, replacement of Huan with Melian, replacement of Orcs and Belegost Dwarves with Nogrod Dwarves). The rest of the story thus can be taken with almost no exception and with minor integrations from other texts. This is my general point of view. Maybe if you like in the following days I'll try to post puntual comments... - Emrys - |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|