Tol-in-Gaurhoth (Isle of Werewolves)

[the guy who be short]

Shiriffs would be quite amusing. Seeing as they have to be secret, we'll be introducing the first Secret Police to Middle-Earth .

[Anguirel]

Of course, in Narnia Jadis' secret police are...you've got it...Wolves!

[Saurreg]

Then may I propose we replace the hunter with the ranger with the exception that if the ranger is sent to hang, he cannot take along another player to the neitherworld?

And I shall be furrier.

[the guy who be short]

Originally Posted by Saurreg

Then may I propose we replace the hunter with the ranger with the exception that if the ranger is sent to hang, he cannot take along another player to the neitherworld?

I like the idea of calling him a Ranger, but I think he should retain his right to kill when hanged. Or lynched, rather. You know, I never liked the idea of hanging... too simple. I think I'll be bringing back some real, good old lynching in this game

[Saurreg]

So can we agree that the hunter will be replaced by a duo of rangers who can coordinate at night?

The only addtional advantage I see is that at most only two more players would know that each other is not a lycan. Fair enough for this large number of players we have.

But when happens if our trio of wolves make the mistake of killing off the rangers. That would leave only one hound left. Is there a need to increase the number of wolves at the start? Or the number of cursed villagers?

[the guy who be short]

Originally Posted by Saurreg

So can we agree that the hunter will be replaced by a duo of rangers who can coordinate at night?

The only addtional advantage I see is that at most only two more players would know that each other is not a lycan. Fair enough for this large number of players we have.

But when happens if our trio of wolves make the mistake of killing off the rangers. That would leave only one hound left. Is there a need to increase the number of wolves at the start? Or the number of cursed villagers?

I don't really think we need to alter anything, and don't see any real reason to insert a new Ranger, or limit their power. I'm thinking perhaps two groups of innocent villagers who know one another could unbalance the game.

What do the rest of you guys think?

And do not worry, my dear Eomer, there will be fire and pitchforks aplenty.

[mormegil]

No I think the additions that have been noted are sufficient and adding another hunter wouldn't be prudent. I think we need to give the villagers a little bit more of an advantage than the currently have I don't think we need to tip the scales needlessly in their favor. Although I see no reason not to call the hunter a ranger (keeping more in line with Tolkien)

[Saurreg]

Ok. Suits me fine.

And just so I get it right; every night the guardian sends the mod a name he/she wants to protect. Rite?

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

You have my utmost support for that tgwbs. I wanted to lynch Holbytlass with pitchforks and fire, but the Hunter business got in the way.

[Holbytlass]

Originally Posted by Eomer of the Rohirrim

. I wanted to lynch Holbytlass with pitchforks and fire...

Ouch!! why.. WHY.. WWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHYYYYYYYYYYY!!