![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
![]() |
![]()
Sorry to double-post, but there is something I forgot to ask.
Menel, why did you vote yesterday for SamwiseGamgee without having previously mentioned any strong suspicion of him? Prior to that, your "maine suspecte" appears to have been Boromir88. Why the sudden switch?
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The bottom of the ocean, discussing philosophy with a giant squid
Posts: 2,254
![]() |
![]()
Ye main reason that I was suspiciouse of Boromir88 was because he was staying somewhatte sliente, posting juste enoughe to not appeare highly suspiciouse, and I thoughte he was doing so deliberately. My suspiciones lessened when I hearde that he really didn't have a choice aboute it. As for who I thinke ye Beare is, I thinke he/she is probably one of ye ones who voted for Nonnacedak yesterDaye, possibly Gurthang since he started ye bandwagon, or maybe dancing spawn who put Non in ye leade.
(I crosse-posted withe Durelin--I was not juste copying her.)
__________________
I ♣ baby seals. Last edited by Meneltarmacil; 08-23-2005 at 11:22 AM. Reason: saying I cross-posted |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Mischievous Candle
|
Quote:
![]() Boromir, you are playing dangerous game. But I tend to agree with you. Right now I'm leaning towards Menel's innocence. Perhaps he was just testing people's reactions with his last post. My top three suspects are (in no particular order) Durelin, Samwise & Gurthang.
__________________
Fenris Wolf
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
Estelo dagnir, Melo ring
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,063
![]() ![]() |
Oh blast it, I have to actually think this through, don't I?
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I also think that we should take a closer look at Dancing Spawn and Gurthang. I don't trust anyone right now, and certainly not Saucepan Man. I think he's going to get us all lynched...next thing you know, he'll be proclaiming himself the Cobbler. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() Durelin, the only remaining Villager, other than yourself, that you did not throw some suspicion towards in that one post of yours is SamwiseGamgee. Is there any doubt now that you are the Cobbler? I mean, we just have to look at your spectacularly bad (or good, depending upon how we look at it ![]() Menel, you didn't answer my question ...
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The bottom of the ocean, discussing philosophy with a giant squid
Posts: 2,254
![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
I ♣ baby seals. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Estelo dagnir, Melo ring
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,063
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Actually, the wolves lost all by themselves. And there was nothing I could do to stop it. I congratulate you, wolves, for making my life even more miserable! I knew I never should have trusted any canine. And I especially thank Sauciepan Man for his spectacular performance, whether it is sincere innocence or mock. The rest of you are slow on the uptake. ![]() And thus, without further ado... ++Durelin Who ever told you cats don't wear shoes?! Shameless EDIT: Saucepan Man is the Hunter, and Boromir88 is the Seer. Last edited by Durelin; 08-23-2005 at 11:50 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Sword of Spirit
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oh, I'm around.
Posts: 1,401
![]() |
Interesting. I see two possibilities.
1. Durelin is the Bear and is lying so that we will not kill her. 2. She is the Cobbler and has given us a known innocent. We now have a choice. We can lynch Durelin to make sure she is not the bear, but that would throw away the advantage of having a known innocent. Or we try to do the multiple lynch and either flush out the bear or lynch it in the proceedings. I think she is the Cobbler. I was suspicious of her towards the beginning(not necassarily of being the cobbler; I'm not as smart as some people. *cough*SosPan*cough*) and I can see that her voting shows that she avoided voting for wolves. Only, since she voted for herself, we can't get a mass lynching, not toDay at least. Or there is always option three: you could do none of the above and completely ignore my idea like last time I brought it up. ![]()
__________________
I'm on a Mission from God. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() OK, here's my plan. If you had not picked up on my numerous (and probably far too heavy handed) hints already, I am the Hunter. If anyone else claims to be the Hunter, they are the Bear and will have lost by doing so. The Bear already knows that I am the Hunter, I am sure of it, so there is no harm in me revealing this now. Durelin has owned up to being the Cobbler. Of course, there is still a outside chance that she is the Bear playing a last, desparate card. But she is certainly not an innocent Villager. So I suggest that we lynch her today. Then, to-Morrow, we will have at least one known innocent (myself or the Seer, possibly both). We organise a mass lynching of everyone - excluding that one known innocent. The Bear will either vote for an innocent who already has a vote (in which case he will have revealed himself, one innocent dies and there will be two innocents left on the last Day to vote for him), he will play along (in which case he dies) or he will refuse to vote (in which case he dies). The only drawback is if I unwittingly kill the Seer tonight. It may therefore be worth the Seer owning up now. Either s/he or I will then die tonight, but we still have our known innocent tomorrow, because the Bear can only kill once per Night. But, before we go any further (and certainly before the Seer reveals him/her-self), please can everyone think about my plan and let me know if they can see any drawbacks or loopholes. I don't think there are, but we must be sure before implementing it. It's drastic, I know, but I think that it will at least guarantee that the Beorning cannot wreak havoc in any other Villages. Edit: Cross-posted with Gurthang, who is thinking along similar lines.
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |