![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
#39 | ||
|
Shade of Carn Dűm
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bree
Posts: 390
![]() |
I haven’t time to reply in full. However, I do require some clarification.
Quote:
Tolkien’s spurious view of chivalry (I say spurious because chivalry does not necessarily equal courtly romance as he seems to take for granted in the above example), is beside the point. That Tolkien believed in original sin is obvious throughout his writings, no less, I’m sure in his letters. I’ve read enough examples on this forum to be convinced. None-the-less, the Catholic notion of the “shipwreck” of the human condition does not negate the essential goodness of the human person. Once again, no human act can undue an act of God. If there is nothing worth saving about sinful humanity, why save it? However, arguing Tolkien’s theology is shaky ground, as he was neither a theologian or philosopher. I admit the only grounds for making the above claims is that Tolkien was an educated and devout Catholic. I don’t think a Catholic Oxford professor would be unfamiliar with Saint Thomas Aquinas, nor do I think a devout Catholic would be of a mind to diverge radically from a system of thought that has been the basis for Catholic doctrine since the Council of Trent. Quote:
At any rate, you bring up other points of interest, but unfortunately I haven’t the time to address them with the sufficiency they deserve.
__________________
I prefer Gillaume d’Férny, connoisseur of fine fruit. |
||
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|