![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Everlasting Whiteness
|
Quote:
++Chief of Guards To go along with the crowd.
__________________
“If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Maundering Mage
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,651
![]() ![]() |
++Beorn
The shape-shifter must die....I mean go
__________________
“I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo. "So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.” |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: far far away
Posts: 275
![]() |
No name no game.
++chief of guerds He dosent stand a chanch.
__________________
if your happy im happy if your sad im sad if you jump of a cliff i watch |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Byronic Brand
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The 1590s
Posts: 2,778
![]() |
I'm swayed by morm.
Beorn is an obnoxious, violent, hooligan with an antitolerant attitude. He's a vegetarian. He runs a vegan farm looked after by talking animals. I imagine he has an irritating Hagrid-like yeaarrrgh voice. A mere furrier! Do away with the insufferable Middle-earth Dr Dolittle! --ROAC, ++BEORN
__________________
Among the friendly dead, being bad at games did not seem to matter -Il Lupo Fenriso |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Riveting Ribbiter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Assigned to Mordor
Posts: 1,767
![]() |
Hmm. I'm torn. Do I vote for the nameless, red-shirted security officer who's bound to die at some point in the show anyway (how did he survive this long?), or for the shape-shifter, who's probably going to cause trouble by changing form into another contestant, the Chief Warg, perhaps?
I think that just decided it. Shape-shifters are interesting to have around for their unpredictablity, but the Chief of Guards is nothing more than a glorified extra. ++CHIEF OF GUARDS
__________________
People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect. But actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey... stuff. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|