![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Beloved Shadow
|
Let's not kid ourselves here, people. A force of hobbits would be useless in roles that required actual combat.
Quote:
Let's say General Pippin orders his hobbits, "Go over there and pelt that Gondorin army with short-bows and slingshots." As soon as the arrows starting flying, King Aragorn would say, "Everyone fall back out of their range, get out your longbows, and kill those little hobbits." And of course, we know how that would turn out. Because of their handicap in the areas of size and strength, hobbits cannot wield weapons that reach as far as those wielded by men and elves. Not only that, but they don't do as much damage either. So, when you pit long-range+high-damage versus short-range+low-damage, who wins every time? I don't think I need to give you the answer to that. A group of men or elves with bows would absolutely destroy a group of hobbit archers. Quote:
I mean, just imagine for one minute- what if the entire scenario of the Battle of Bywater was kept exactly the same, only instead of hobbits there were Noldorin soldiers fighting against Saruman's men. Heh- you want to talk about a slaughter. I doubt a single elf would get killed. The fact is, there is not a single military operation that hobbits have ever done that wouldn't have been executed better by elves or men. Scouting is the only thing that hobbits would be good for.
__________________
the phantom has posted.
This thread is now important. |
||
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|