Tol-in-Gaurhoth XXI: Dueling Wizards Werewolf

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

Precisely Gurthang! That's what made me hesitate to post the theory, because Fea might do all that stuff anyway. She does come across as a bit.....well, a bit much, if you'll follow me. Plus, if I may take the chance to use a line they always use against me: "We're gonna lynch her anyway, might as well do it now!"

(That wasn't serious, by the way.)

Oh, Kit. That hurts me. Is it because I said you'd make an ace EW pick? I'll forgive you: SPM and Naria's doom must still be hurting you.

Diamond's thoughts on Azaelia are interesting. I will go to scour these words...

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

Morm, I must disagree. Your case against me was pretty much that I was pulling off this tremendous bluff. My case against Fea concerned her odd behaviour and ideas.

Anyway, Valier: could you explain why Nogrod and Naria would have been bad picks for the GW? I'm not sure I get it.

[Valier]

According to my lorebooks Eomer, both Naria and Nogrod's ancestors were always highly suspected in the early days and most of the time found to be baddies or Goodies, so the GW would stay away from people they know will get killed early on, but the EW would think the other way...since these two get suspected as evil most of the time, they (EW) would hope they would get dismissed on these points this game....I hope this makes sense.. My ansestors in the Lore books have always made strange connections like this and they mostly work out and as I attempted to sleep last night (RL) I made these connections. After I learned that Naria was infact a wolf as was Nogrod, my brain came up with connections between Roa, Diamond, Kath or Sleepy as the EW and after I read through their posts, I begain to see odd things as I have posted above.

[mormegil]

Originally Posted by Eomer of the Rohirrim

Morm, I must disagree. Your case against me was pretty much that I was pulling off this tremendous bluff. My case against Fea concerned her odd behaviour and ideas.

The way I see it Eomer is that we are both saying "Here's a character that is acting in such a way that they could be the EW if said person behaves in a particular way." Both people we theorized about behave the way necissary to meet those conditions however, that is normal behavior for those individuals therefore it might go either way. I'm not saying there isn't merit to your arguement but like mine it's rather contingent and a bit circumstantial.

PS sorry for making so many short post in a short amount of time but that's the way it's had to be today playing catch up.