WW XXIIX - Queer Lodgings

[Volo]

This is a hard place, I can't find anybody worth enough to get a vote. Luckily there is still time to think.

I actually find Duriel (Farael/Durin) innocentish. I feel that he is confused or then it's just that he hasn't fooled me with that one before.
But on the other hand, he hasn't contributed that much himself either (Oh, who's talking...) and he's logic is contradictory, encouraging random votes.

We shall see...

Meneltarmacil Baggins seems pretty innocent, he has said a few earnest-sounding things.

Dancing Dwalin has contributed well, either she's a loud wolf or indeed of help, I'll just follow her for now.

But Bomburlass, she seems a bit too quiet... She's taking a bit too long to come with her checking. For now, I'll think that she's busy (Aren't we all?).

Thoringuriel... I can't understand this one. He's been around a lot, but nearly all of his talk is in character chatting.

Eomi, like Dorimor88 said, nothing can be found to say about Eomi. I suggest you stop you in characterism for a while and say something. If you ask me, he has contributed close to nothing but seems to be awake.

Orilin, just like Eomi.

More later... From those I find Eomi and Orilin the ones that deserve a vote. But Thoringuriel and Bomburlass also seem to have a potential of being suspected by me.

An other thing I want to ask. What use is there from the Protector? He dies himself, if he protects somebody, that doesn't feel too useful, unless there is a Seer to protect.


EDIT: x:d with Holbytlass

[Nogrod]

About Orilin.

Nothing more to add but these:

Originally Posted by Ori

#36
Hah, I didn't even know Kathin had posted...but that's pretty standard for her. Which is always worrisome.

Originally Posted by Ori

#42
Both Rune and Kath have posted, but just once, and have drawn extremely little attention to themselves (not that anyone's drawn an extraordinary amount of attention). But they've still done enough (well, simply posted) to not get on the "has yet to post list" that some people tend to have their eyes on. For Kath, this is normal. So for now, I'm not going to even vote for her.

I'm not sure how to read this. Does this read to her favour or the contrary? She speaks of Kathin and somewhat suspects her but clearly underlines that her little-talking is normal and thence not reason to actually go after her... Hmm. This really could bite both ways.

Originally Posted by Beornómien

Meneltarbo's vote was a bit odd. It was too sudden. He had not suspected Kathin before. Then he just based his vote on dwancing spawn's and my points about her, without even bothering to specify which "from what was said earlier" made him vote her.

Nari made quite exactly the same thing earlier on... going for then favourite Glóanna. So trying to make it the easy way or trying to hide in a supposed majority?

[Thinlómien]

Originally Posted by Nogrod

Nari made quite exactly the same thing earlier on... going for then favourite Glóanna.

That is quite weird, I mean, I did notice that, but it didn't really make me raise eyebrows. When Menel did the same, I was instantly finding something wrong with it. Maybe Naria is just such a charming personality...

I have to vote soon, and I'm not yet sure who I will vote. Most probably Glóanna or Kathin, unless rereading gives me some new, splendid idea or a I notice something remarkable.

edit: xed with Volo

[dancing spawn of ungoliant]

And here I thought that I had pretty much just insulted everyone today, but it's good to know that I still come across as befriending.

Originally Posted by Bomburlass

It seems that Kitanna(Gloin) is acting highly suspicious but what are the odds that she be afflicted twice in a row? But that would be delving into the inner workings of The Necromancer and her ways. Would she be totally random in which GloKit would have a 1/17 chance of being a wolf just like the rest of us or would she tweak the roles for evil amusemsent? We can't know now.

Actually, a 3/17 chance. It seems that Bomburlass is disregarding Glóanna's "highly suspicious acting" just based on odds which makes me wonder. There's also the ever so useful 'we can't know' statement. Are you two in cahoots, eh?

Well, I'll decide my vote soon.