Future nazgûl: good or evil Men?

[Gordis]

Originally Posted by Alfirin

on the selection of Nazgul to be:
Wasn't there something about Sauron giving power's without rings to two Black Numernoreans who went on to become great cheiftans amoung the Haradrim? I seem to recall, whne reading this passage that it sounded like Sauron would have liked to number them amoung his Nazgul but had run out of rings by then.

You seem to refer to Herumor and Fuinur mentioned in the "Rings of Power and the Third Age". I also think that by the time of the Downfall, Sauron had no Rings left.
Otherwise, one would have been handy for Ar-Pharazon.

[Gordis]

Here is what Morthoron replied to the previous post

Originally Posted by Morthoron

Interesting concept, but I still disagree with you. Here is a footnote from Letter#156:

And another regarding the amplification of personal attributes in Letter#131:

These quotes, taken in conjunction with previous quotes I offered from 'Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age' lead me to the conclusion that Sauron chose those Men who were more apt to be led into temptation (i.e., those displaying the attributes of greed and a lust for power). These would not be Men of the mold of a Faramir or Aragorn, noble and good and not prone to corruption, rather Men already exhibiting evil tendencies: vicious warriors, sorcerors (the word 'sorcery' nearly always connotes evil in Tolkienic jargon), and avaricious kings (the Sauronic Numenoreans referred to above).

Ockham's razor. The easiest path is the one of least resistance. We know that at least three of the Nazgul were Numenoreans (whom Tolkien identified as 'wicked kings' and Sauronic), and Khamul was an Easterling, and they seem to have been ever under the subjugation of Sauron. Even you agree in least in part the means by which Sauron chose the Ringbearers:

An able 'sorceror' (like the Black Numenorean Mouth of Sauron) would be evil, as sorcery, or more particularly Necromancy, was always considered evil in Middle-earth.

Aragorn, like Faramir, rejected the Ring. Isildur and Boromir could not. This denotes characteristic virtues for the former, and fatal flaws in the latter that could be twisted to Sauron's will. But I see your point -- it's just that it seems more likely that a truly good and noble character would not associate with Sauron in the first place, and a wise man would always question gifts from a dark source.

Thanks for the kind words. That story was a pleasure to write. I don't know where you read it at (its posted on at least two sites), but there is a companion piece 'The Quest of the Three Kindreds' floating about as well.

As far as the Ring going to Khamul, he was, of course, a chieftain of the great confederation of tribes eventually to be known as the Balchoth (and save for some bad luck, and miscalculation of his enemies strength and cunning, could have been emperor of all lands east of the Orocarni Mountains). If you remember, the Ring was offered to Cui-Baili's father, Cui-Ealain, who rejected the embassy of Mordor (wisely on his part, but it was to cause his death). Had Sauron offered the Ring to a later generation, he might have caught Cui-Baili at a weak moment at the end of his life, but domination or avarice was not necessarily motivational factors for Cui-Baili, so it really wouldn't have worked.

[Gordis]

Originally Posted by Inziladun

I find it hard to sympathize with either the Nazgûl betrayed by the Nine, or the Dwarves who possessed the Seven.
Morthoron seems to overall have the right of this. The desire of power beyond one's innate abilities is never represented as a wholly positive virtue in Tolkien's world. He said as much in Letter # 131:

Actually we must distinguish what we are talking about: 1. our ability to sympathize with Tolkien characters, 2. Tolkien’s own assessment of them in the Letters etc. or 3. (I don’t even know how to put it) maybe what we perceive as objective view…

1. Our ability to sympathize with characters varies greatly. You find it hard to feel sympathy for the Nine Men and the Dwarves who got the Seven, while I am able to sympathize with almost anyone: certainly the nazgul, Boromir, Denethor, Saruman, Isildur, Ar-Pharazon, and even sometimes (though it is harder) with Gollum, Grima, Lotho, the Mouth, Sauron, Morgoth and Feanor.

2. Tolkien assessment of good and evil should certainly be taken into consideration, even it it differs from our own views. Yes, for Tolkien “power” is an ominous word, and those who desire “power beyond the measure of their kind” are condemned. Also he strongly condemns hubris and impatience. He is all for humility and patience. Yet, even with these standards, I feel he is a bit partial to his characters: there are his favorite ones who get a lot forgiven. Take his good Aragorn. His goal in life? To become King of the reunited Kingdom. Isn’t it desire for power? Now as to “beyond the measure of his kind” – sorry, but he brought an army of Dead to Pelargir, to fight the living. When the Witch-King had done something similar (sent the Wights to the Barrows of Cardolan), he was universally blamed. And so on.

3. An objective view perhaps is unattainable, but we may try…

Originally Posted by Inziladun

Men seem to have wanted the Nine to gain Power for its own sake, evidenced by what they used them for: to be invisible, to see things in the shadows that were hidden from others, to increase their stature among their peers. What 'good' reason could they have had for wanting the Nine, regardless of their character before they received them?

There is a great selection of possible decent reasons: to fight Sauron’s magick (same reasons as Gandalf and Galadriel have in LOTR), to become Kings and/or to marry beloved women (same reason as with Aragorn), to defend their countries (same as Baromir and Denethor), to promote progress, order and technology (same as Sauron and Saruman). Even to try and prolong Men’s lives is a worthy reason –aren’t we all striving to do this even now? Yes, in Tolkien’s world it is frowned upon, as it is against the Design of Eru, but then the Elves who forged the Rings and the ones who used the Three in the Third Age to prevent fading or for other things are at least as guilty – in fact much more, because they knew full well what exactly they were doing and whose know-how they were using.

Originally Posted by Inziladun

Sauron appears to have basically said, "Here are some magic rings, use them as you will, discover their powers". And so they did.

It may have been like that with Easterling and Southron nazgul. They had hardly heard about the designs of Eru, about the Valar etc. while in the Second Age Sauron of Mordor was regarded as a worthy ally, benefactor, if not as God. Why question his gifts?

Yet with Numenorean nazgul it had to be far harder: Sauron was the Enemy, and what is more, recently conquered enemy. Pride, if nothing else, wouldn’t allow them to listen to him readily or turn to his side willingly. I don’t believe Sauron had approached them straight-on, most likely he had come in disguise to thrust the rings upon his chosen victims. He could pose as an Elf, refugee of Eregion: “Please keep this Elven ring, Lord, it is the last of the Nine…Sauron hunts me, but he mustn’t get it,” or he could invent another scheme. Sauron was very clever and very sly. The fact that the Elves chose to keep all the matter of the Rings secret from their allies the Numenoreans did help Sauron’s designs a lot. A timely warning from the Elves could have alerted the future nazgul, but then again, the Elves had no idea about Sauron’s new plan to give rings to other races. They didn’t know Men were in danger.

Originally Posted by Inziladun

I don't think Men, however, were more vulnerable to 'avarice' then the Dwarves. It is stated that inflaming their desire for wealth was the only power exercised over the Dwarves by the Seven. Their 'immunity' to the other effects of the Rings though, was only due to their fundamental makeup and not something they were able to consciously effect.

Yes, I agree. Rings work on one’s fundamental desires: power and long life for Men, slowing Time and preservation for Elves, riches for Dwarves, wondrous gardens for hobbit gardeners, fish for Gollums. The Dwarves were fundamentally different from Elves and Men – it seems they had no access to the Spirit World whatsoever. Maybe that’s why it was rumored among Elves that Dwarves had no souls…

Originally Posted by Inziladun

Even the Three were not completely 'good': they too enhanced the powers of the possessor, but it seems the Elves were able to use the Three because they were somewhat protected from corruption by the unnatural power they had gained by the underlying purposes of them: preservation and healing, as stated by Gordis.

Elves were able to use the Three only AFTER Sauron lost his Ring. In the Second age they were afraid (and rightly) to wear their Rings even for a minute. But they were afraid only because they knew about the existence of the One and that Sauron had it. The Nine Men didn’t know about it, so they got caught. According to Sauron’s original plan, Elves would have been in the nazgul’s place.

I have to go, I will reply to Morthoron later…

[Morthoron]

My, for never having posted on this thread, I certainly have many posts here. Gordis, I name thee Lord of the Cut and Paste. Instead of Rings, you'll be handing out scissors.

Now, back to what I was saying, or at least trying to imply. Sauron, in a mephistophelian manner, beguiles and plays upon inherent character flaws of each of the races (Elves, Dwarves and Men).

The Elves eventually prove to be incorruptible, but were, nevertheless, naive at best, or at worst overambitious and greedy, and welcomed Annatar; that is, Celebrimbor and Smiths of Eregion did. Wiser and more calculating Elves such as Gil-Galad and Galadriel seemed to have asked the simple question: 'Annatar, just who in the Angband are you?' This is one of those annoying little points that is rarely discussed on these and other fora. Did some of the Elves so lack common sense that they accepted Annatar without reservation? I mean, really, many of the Elves in the 2nd Age had lived in Aman previously, and were intimate with both the Valar and Maiar. Isn't it odd that no Eregion Elf asked, 'Ummm...dude, like, I never saw you boogie-boarding Taniquetil, and, like, I didn't catch you at any frat-parties at Ezellohar. What, were you like hangin' with Irmo in Lorien in, like, a dream state or sumptin?'

The warnings were there. Other Elves eschewed Annatar's advances. Was it naivety then, or was it (and this seems more likely) a character flaw in Celebrimbor? It would seem the curse of Mandos was visited on the clan of Feanor down to its last generation. Blind ambition, loving too well the work of one's hands, vanity, conceit -- these are the hallmark of the Feanorians, and Sauron found in these traits the method by which he could control the Noldor of Eregion.

Of the Nine and the Seven, I believe you can lump them together into the 'Sinful Sixteen', as they really did not have separate traits; rather, Sauron merely divided them up according to his designs, playing on the character flaws inherent in the Dwarves (avarice) and Men (lust for power as well as greed):

But Sauron gathered into his hands all the remaining Rings of Power (that is the Seven and the Nine]; and he dealt them out to the other peoples of Middle-earth, hoping thus to bring under his sway all those that desired secret power beyond the measure of their kind. Seven Rings he gave to the Dwarves; but to Men he gave nine, for Men proved in this matter as in others the readiest to his will [my emphasis].

The Dwarves proved impossible to dominate, but the Rings awoke their lust for gold (and the seven hordes of the old Dwarf Lords was each founded on a Ring). Of Men, however, Sauron seems to have chosen more selectively:

There were evil Numenoreans: Sauronians, but they do not come into this story, except remotely; as the wicked Kings who had become Nazgul or Ringwraiths.

...But also they enhanced the natural power of a possessor -- this approaching 'magic', a motive easily corruptible into evil, a lust for domination [my emphasis].

Men proved easier to ensnare. Those who used the Nine Rings became mighty in their day, kings, sorcerors and warriors of old. They obtained glory and great wealth, yet it turned to their undoing.

'Wicked Kings', 'sorcerors', 'warriors' -- you will notice Tolkien never uses a definor such as 'wise loremasters', benevolent lords', 'noble knights' -- he preyed upon those who already exhibited traits necessary to ensnare them: they were the 'wicked Kings', the Black Numenoreans who already worshipped Sauron in the Dark Ages of the Second Age; they were 'sorcerors' (like the Mouth of Sauron, another Black Numenorean in the next Age), who sought arcane power through the necromantic arts (again, Tolkien never uses the words 'sorceror' or 'sorcery' in a positive or good light); and 'warriors', which by any sense of the word does not indicate an interest in statecraft, charity or compassion, rather, bloodlust, vainglory and conquering. There had to be a flaw for Sauron to work on. Each candidate was already exhibiting some trait that the Ring could swell to enormous proportions. If someone does not seek power, does not lust for gold or is not ambitious in the negative sense, it doesn't make much sense that Sauron would be handing them a Ring.

[Bêthberry]

Stepping in here without having read all the precursor posts and threads . . . (a danger, I know! )

Originally Posted by Morthoron

If someone does not seek power, does not lust for gold or is not ambitious in the negative sense, it doesn't make much sense that Sauron would be handing them a Ring.

Hmmm. But imagine the gloating, vainglory, lust, and delicious bequiling and exquisite expertise that could motivate Sauron to tempt Virtue. Talk about power. Talk about a dangerous liaison.

After all, eventually even Frodo succumbed to the One Ring.

[Morthoron]

Originally Posted by Bêthberry

Hmmm. But imagine the gloating, vainglory, lust, and delicious bequiling and exquisite expertise that could motivate Sauron to tempt Virtue. Talk about power. Talk about a dangerous liaison.

Yes, I suppose that would be enjoyable for him; however, considering his failure to corrupt the elves, I would assume he was not in a playful mood. And the Rings could always be used against him (which was always a grave concern of his). Also, one must consider Middle-earth at the time was at the absolute nadir of mannish virtue. It was the Dark Ages, really, and even the Numenoreans who came across the sea were now prone to ill-will. Sauron needed lieutenants to brutally force his agenda, not trophies to gloat over. Uncertainty always plagued Sauron.

Originally Posted by Bêthberry

After all, eventually even Frodo succumbed to the One Ring.

And he refused it at first or tried to give it away afterwards on several occasions. The danger for Sauron is a highly-principled man of virtue returning the ring to the Elves, where it would be lost to the Dark Lord. As Tolkien said, Sauron only he had nine to dole out, he had to do it judiciously.

[Gordis]

Morthoron:
Let us look again at the quotes (the emphasis mine):

Men proved easier to ensnare. Those who used the Nine Rings became mighty in their day, kings, sorcerors and warriors of old. They obtained glory and great wealth, yet it turned to their undoing.-Of the Rings of Power

Note: the Men became mighty, became Kings (or mightier Kings than they used to be) and became sorcerers (or mightier sorcerers than they were before) after they started using the Rings. They were already ring-wielders, their minds exposed to Sauron's corruption.

What happened next? They had a very long life that seemed unending:

They had, as it seemed, unending life, yet life became unendurable to them. They could walk, if they would, unseen by all eyes in this world beneath the sun, and they could see things in worlds invisible to mortal men; but too often they beheld only the phantoms and delusions of Sauron. And one by one, sooner or later, according to their native strength and to the good or evil of their wills in the beginning, they fell under the thraldom of the ring that they bore and under the domination of the One, which was Sauron's.-ibid

Note here to the good or evil of their wills in the beginning - at the beginning some were good-willed then (!) -, but during their long lives they progressively became evil because of the Rings. So how would they be remembered in history? Not by their early years of liberty, but by their evil deeds and their corruption during their prolonged lives as wicked Kings of the quote, soon to be Ringwraiths:

There were evil Numenoreans: Sauronians, but they do not come into this story, except remotely; as the wicked Kings who had become Nazgul or Ringwraiths. Letter#156

Originally Posted by Morthoron

'Wicked Kings', 'sorcerors', 'warriors' -- you will notice Tolkien never uses a definor such as 'wise loremasters', benevolent lords', 'noble knights' -- he preyed upon those who already exhibited traits necessary to ensnare them: they were the 'wicked Kings', the Black Numenoreans who already worshipped Sauron in the Dark Ages of the Second Age;

Nay, nay. Before SA 2251, the year when the Ringwraiths first appear (TY), there were no Black Numenoreans as yet, even the division into the King's men (precursors of Black Numenoreans) and the Faithful had not yet occured. The three Numenoreans with the Rings had became the very first Black Numenoreans (defined as Morgoth worshippers loyal to Sauron) in history. Their conversion was not natural, it was induced by their Rings. The others Black Numenoreans appeared en masse only about a thousand years later, with the coming of Sauron to the Island. No wonder the memory of the ancient Black Kings among the Faithful was evil.

There is another quote in the letters:

To attempt by device or 'magic' to recover longevity is a supreme folly and wickedness of 'mortals'. Longevity or counterfeit 'immortality' (true immortality is beyond Ea) is the chief bait of Sauron – it leads the small to a Gollum, and the great to a Ringwraith.-L#212

Here the chief bait is singled out - immortality - the bait especially attractive for Numenoreans, obsessed by Death and Immortality. Also note that the future nazgul are called "Great" men - not some evil scoundrels willingly serving Sauron.
Here it is again:

Yet Sauron was ever guileful, and it is said that among those whom he ensnared with the Nine Rings three were great lords of Númenórean race.-Akallabeth

Originally Posted by Morthoron

Sauron chose those Men who were more apt to be led into temptation (i.e., those displaying the attributes of greed and a lust for power). These would not be Men of the mold of a Faramir or Aragorn, noble and good and not prone to corruption, rather Men already exhibiting evil tendencies: vicious warriors, sorcerors (the word 'sorcery' nearly always connotes evil in Tolkienic jargon), and avaricious kings (the Sauronic Numenoreans referred to above)

The future nazgul had to have some character flaws, but they were not necessarily evi - even the "sorcerers". Among Easterlings and Southrons magicians were likely much respected. The Numenoreans (especially those with Elven blood) had some inherent supernatural abilities: glimpses into the future, healing powers, ability for Osanwe etc. Some may have been more gifted than the others and interested in exploring and perfectioning their skills. After all, even after the Downfall the Dunedain of Arnor were able to forge magic blades. Wasn't it sorcery? Recall: at the Moria gates Gandalf tried a lot of opening spells in mannish tongues. I think Tolkien only condemns necromancy (pardoning however his favorites like Aragorn ), as to the rest, the good or evil intent is of major importance.

Now to Aragorn and Faramir. Aragorn desired power and victory: I bet he was tempted by the Ring no less than Boromir. But his case was special - he was Elrond's foster-son and Gandalf's pupil. He must have been warned again and again not to touch the Ring: taught on Isildur's example.

Faramir was of another ilk - a bit Bombadil-ish, so to say. He had zero hubris just by nature. In Elros's line such guys (loremasters by calling, not rulers or warriors) happen occasionally: Vardamir Nolimon, Aldarion's father Tar-Meneldur, maybe also Tar-Minastir. These guys would be tempted by the rings of power far less, no doubt, than their more warlike, adventurous, proud and power-hungry relatives (Tar-Aldarion, Tar-Ciryatan and Tar-Atanamir, Isildur etc.). I wouldn't call the latter evil and even flawed: it is just another temperament. And yes, because of it they make greater Kings and better nazgul. I doubt Sauron would even try to slip a Ring to a quiet loremaster: what for? To have one ring less and the boring wraith of the quiet loremaster studying manuscripts in the next room in Barad-Dur for all eternity?

Originally Posted by Morthoron

Did some of the Elves so lack common sense that they accepted Annatar without reservation?

The Mirdain were ancient Calaquendi Noldorin Elves. By mid-Second Age they became as much obsessed with fading as the Numenoreans later became obsessed with Death. They desired to prevent fading so very much, that they were ready to welcome anyone who promised to solve the problem. The situation Annatar-Celebrimbor exactly mirrors the situation Pharazon-Zigur. Ar-Pharazon knew beyond doubt that Zigur was Sauron, Celebrimbor may have suspected it, but deliberately didn't want to know.
As for Galadriel… Sauron had tortured and killed her brother Finrod, fed him to the wolves. Yet for a thousand years she wore the Ring made by Sauron's design, with his know-how. The desire to tweak nature for her own ends was too strong.

Originally Posted by Morthoron

Thanks for the kind words. That story was a pleasure to write. I don't know where you read it at (its posted on at least two sites), but there is a companion piece 'The Quest of the Three Kindreds' floating about as well.

As far as the Ring going to Khamul, he was, of course, a chieftain of the great confederation of tribes eventually to be known as the Balchoth (and save for some bad luck, and miscalculation of his enemies strength and cunning, could have been emperor of all lands east of the Orocarni Mountains). If you remember, the Ring was offered to Cui-Baili's father, Cui-Ealain, who rejected the embassy of Mordor (wisely on his part, but it was to cause his death). Had Sauron offered the Ring to a later generation, he might have caught Cui-Baili at a weak moment at the end of his life, but domination or avarice was not necessarily motivational factors for Cui-Baili, so it really wouldn't have worked.

I've read it on fanfiction.net. If you have it somewhere else, please post the link, as ff.net is a horrible site. As for Cui-Bali, I think the prolongation of his life (wasn't he childless with no heirs?)and worry for his country would be wonderful baits. Especially if Sauron sent the Ring apparently from someone else (Elves?), Cui-Bali wouldn't even be suspicious.