T-I-G LV Sing when you're winning

[Aganzir]

On day 1 Boro deduced Fea had made a fake confession when saying she was a wolf. He also said that tgwbs's and Fea's lists were different from Brinn's, whose list was more suspicious as she looked like she didn't want to step on anyone's toes. Well Brinn was an ordo whereas both tgwbs and Fea had special roles.

Then there's this little exchange concerning Fea & phantom's code talk, which I believe was one of the things that I found a bit alarming at first. However all the time that I was reading through Fea's posts I thought it was about communication between a critic and the cobbler so that might explain it. It's mostly the catching things part...

Originally Posted by Boro

I have safe hands.

Boro what did you mean with the following?

Originally Posted by Boro on Fea

I'm waiting on one more thing from her, if I see it, I would bet she's innocent, if not - well you can guess.

While reading through Fea's posts after tgwbs's death, I noticed her use of the word follow. Dunno if it means anything, but it's repeated thrice, which seems to me to be more than necessary. Underlinings mine.

Originally Posted by Fea, day 2

Does the Cobbler/Spy get to find out the role of the person s/he spies on, or is that information given only to the Critics? Because if the Cobbler knows her/his marks, than there's an extra player on the side of evil who knows that who s/he may or may not be voting for is ordo. Do you follow?

I think it looks like Fea was trying to fish for a reaction from the cobbler. Unless I missed a post, Boro was the only one who replied to it.

Originally Posted by Boro

I can't see how the cobbler would be able to pass on info that xe didn't know xeself. (Did I use that properly?) That would make a giant continuity problem within the fabric of the performance.

Originally Posted by Fea

Cobbler sends choice to Mith, Mith sends choice to Critics. I envision it sort of like the Cobbler picks up a packet of information which xe never gets to read. Of, of course, Cobbler PMs Mith, Mith PMs back, Mith PMs Cobbler. I know Mith used the phrase 'blind drop' and I assume that means that the Cobbler doesn't get to PM the Critics (that the Cobbler doesn't know their identity) but I just wondered if it meant that the Cobbler doesn't actually know the info that xe is acquiring.

Originally Posted by Boro

But see the massive inconsistancy? How could you justify a dead drop info to the wolves if the Cobbler doesn't know the info xe is dropping off? Xe's a sneak, not a hallucinajenic.

Boro's responses don't look very much like he was giving cobbler hints to Fea. I think this discussion was another thing that made me doubt his intentions, though. Just because he was the only one who responded.

Another quote with follow, and I really have no idea if this means anything or not.

Originally Posted by Fea

On a more-serious-than-movie-reference note, isn't this essentially what we do even when he's not OG? We know he wasn't a critic, and we know he wasn't The Cobbler, but just as if he was still playing, we don't know his priorities (apart from 'himself') and we know he has no special other knowledge he can give us. So I propose this: it's dangerous to assume he's a declared innocent, because he's not: he's a declared OG, which, if you've watched the musical/movie or read the book, Erik was a nutjob serial killer with an absolute skill at torture and manipulate. The trapdoor king. So I propose: we listen to him about as much as we normally do: if his suggestions seem reasonable, we take a shot. If he sounds a bit too much like himself, we skip it.

Everybody follow?

And the last one which was directed at Boro, again with follow.

Originally Posted by Fea

Versus you... now you're usually not so forgiving to me as oh, say... I am. So why the switch now?

Unless you're trying to save me.

If you can't, I say you... take advantage. If you follow.

I don't quite know if I should make anything of that. I believe Fea was trying to find the cobbler, but it's still possible that xe didn't realise it or want to risk giving xemself away, and Fea tried to frame Boro who had reacted to it.

Tgwbs had Boro listed as the most innocent but I don't know if it means anything. Despite this all I'm inclined to believe he dreamed of Fea, maybe on night 1, just because it would suit tgwbseer so well. And it's possible he put my name next to Fea's just so as not to be so obvious, or because he thought I looked as suspicious as she (it happens surprisingly often when people play with me for the first time in ages).
He found Boro innocent already on day 1, and I can't see why he'd later dream of someone he considered innocent. An innocent Mac could have been his night 2 dream, especially given his sudden turn on me then.
A Boro dream is possible but nothing that should be taken for granted.

**

What on earth is this?

Originally Posted by Fea

Dear David Bowie: I am still in love with your makeup. ♥me.

**

Also Boro, when did you figure out my role?

And people, I haven't decided yet who I am going to kill, and I'd like to know your opinions as well because otherwise there's a risk I only choose between those I've paid more attention thus far.

Mac, it's also possible the wolves wanted to encourage suspicions against an innocent sally when killing Brinn.

edit: xed with two Gollums