WWLVIII: Escape From Angband (or Behavioral Modification)

[Isabellkya]

To Dury. An explanation.

As I said on Day Two - there is no seer.
There are people who fancy themselves to be the seer, because they know more than the average villager. Some, are not at liberty to even infer that they know more. Just because you think you are a seer, because of your abilities - does not a seer make.


X'd with Nog.

[Gwathagor]

Originally Posted by Isabellkya

To Dury. An explanation.

As I said on Day Two - there is no seer.
There are people who fancy themselves to be the seer, because they know more than the average villager. Some, are not at liberty to even infer that they know more. Just because you think you are a seer, because of your abilities - does not a seer make.


X'd with Nog.

Actually, I'm the seer - according to sally, at any rate. And I get these crazy dreams at Night and stuff. It's wild.

[Nogrod]

Originally Posted by Izzy

Oh.
Haha. Right in front of my face.
I think I completely understand Rikae's role now. I doubt she is as dangerous as the WereDucks.

Don't listen to that cobbler there... unless she really has a good explanation for her "complete understanding". Somehow she just decided to play confident but for some reason not to say out aloud what is her idea of Rikae's role (buying time to come up with one?).

But by saying "I doubt she is as dangerous as the WereDucks" she admits Rikae is up to no good, so she could as well tell us what is her theory (or clear and self-evident vision "in front of her face"). One doesn't need to shy away from revealing a baddie of any sort; one only needs to be careful not to reveal a special goodie.

And this also is the reason why we shouldn't try any double- or triple-lynches toDay. There are too many unknown factors around who could twist the vote at the last minutes - and fex. the cobblers would be happy to sacrifice themselves for the greater glory of the ducks (not to speak of possible other baddies who could get their evil extra-capabilities triggered by a lynch the next Day).

Now to sleep for good.

[Rikae]

Lest anybody have second thoughts (God forbid!):

--Macalaure

++Rikae

So long, duckies, sorry I couldn't be more helpful!

[Gwathagor]

That's interesting.



Nilp ++ Mac (Mac 1)
Nilp – Mac ( )
Fea ++ Nilp (Nilp 1)
Fea – Nilp ( )
Rikae ++ Mac (Mac 1)
Nilp ++ Durelin (Dury 1, Mac 1)
Mac ++ Rikae (Rikae 1, Dury 1, Mac 1)
Mith ++ Durelin (Dury 2, Rikae 1, Mac 1)
Nerwen ++ Rikae (Rikae 2, Dury 2, Mac 1)
Nogrod ++ Rikae (Rikae 3, Dury 2, Mac 1)
Rikae – Mac (Rikae 3, Dury 2)
Rikae ++ Rikae (Rikae 4, Dury 2)


I'm curious why we're lynching Rikae rather than trying to find a duck. Is it the attraction of lynching a practically known cobbler rather than a supposed duck? I am still all for making it a double lynch and getting rid of both Nilp and Rikae.

[Gwathagor]

Oh yeah, just throwing this out there - I'm pretty sure the reason Brinn was killed was that one of the wolves figured out that we were lovers and so were trying to kill two birds with one stone.

[Gwathagor]

Just in case anyone feels similarly:

++NILP

[Gwathagor]

Originally Posted by Gwathagor

were trying to kill two birds with one stone.

Ha ha. Oh that's an ironic figure of speech to use.

[Feanor of the Peredhil]

Nilp ++ Mac (Mac 1)
Nilp – Mac ( )
Fea ++ Nilp (Nilp 1)
Fea – Nilp ( )
Rikae ++ Mac (Mac 1)
Nilp ++ Durelin (Dury 1, Mac 1)
Mac ++ Rikae (Rikae 1, Dury 1, Mac 1)
Mith ++ Durelin (Dury 2, Rikae 1, Mac 1)
Nerwen ++ Rikae (Rikae 2, Dury 2, Mac 1)
Nogrod ++ Rikae (Rikae 3, Dury 2, Mac 1)
Rikae – Mac (Rikae 3, Dury 2)
Rikae ++ Rikae (Rikae 4, Dury 2)
Gwath ++ Nilp (Rikae 4, Dury 2, Nilp 1)
Dury ++ Rikae (Rikae 5, Dury 2, Nilp 1)

++RIKAE

Other issues can be attended to at another time.

I find the possibility of a multi-lynch rather unacceptable without knowing things as certain.

[satansaloser2005]

All gifteds (dead and alive) please re-send your picks from the last *thinks* two Nights so I'll have them. My document with all my notes just got corrupted and I don't know if I'll be able to get it back. I sent an older version to a dead player and will be able to (hopefully) get it back, but it won't be updated, so if you can do that it would be fantastic. Thanks.

[satansaloser2005]

(insert Rikae's narration here)

Not quite Day yet. Don't post.

[satansaloser2005]

I had an English symposium type thing tonight and just returned. Rest assured, I'm not going to bed until I catch up on all narrations.

For now, though.


Kath is dead. She was a were-duck. (She was not modfired, by the way.)

Gwath is dead. He was the seer.

[the phantom]

Bolshevik Revolution!!

[Isabellkya]

I was so ready to vote for Kath in this very first post.

*sigh*

Two kills during the Night?
They seem to equal each other out, sort of.

Get right to it. Nilp is not a Were creature.

Remember what I said yesterDay.


Out of game stuffies. I'm on my way to bed here shortly. been up way too long today for driving. Getting used to this time change makes it harder. I shall be back tomorrow however. Don't be too hasty.


X'D with silly zombie.

[the phantom]

Originally Posted by Izzy

Don't be too hasty.

That's what she said.

[Nerwen]

Everybody cheer
For our greatest Seer!
Let's hear it for the mighty Gwath!
He wasn't even afraid of Kath!

YAAAAY!!!!

Stay tuned. Awesome post about Izzy coming up.

[Feanor of the Peredhil]

Originally Posted by Isabellkya

Remember what I said yesterDay.

Remember precisely. "No seer."

Gwath-seer dead.

Ploy?

Kath-duck dead.

Shrunken flock. How many left?

Vote today important. Known innocents dwindle quickly. Duck[s] only kill one per Night. Speed up death if village lynches wrong.

[Durelin]

Wow! I wonder if we're down to a lone-duck yet.

Originally Posted by Izzy

Get right to it. Nilp is not a Were creature.

Remember what I said yesterDay.

Definitely not seeing how these two are related.

A nasty cold and school + this game will be the death of me. My brain is calling it a night right now. Hopefully it will wake up at some point tomorrow.