![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 240
![]() |
I don't think in this instance the screenwriters altered the meaning of the text all that much. Obviously in the movies when all the companions pledge there support the dialogue is completely made up. And in the books The Council ends with Frodo saying he'll take the Ring and Sam jumping in. Later Elrond informs Frodo of his other companions and Merry and Pippin are the last two. All the screenwriters did was condense and have the entire Fellowship form during The Council of Elrond. I think it was necessary condensement to keep the movie going and the Fellowship out of Rivendell. For this to happen, yes dialogue had to be invented and it does look like some companions pledge an oath to Frodo.
But, I find Elrond's choice of words, regarding any oath on the Fellowship important: Quote:
Quote:
There were far worse diversions from the script than the scenes being discussed. Yes the dialogue is completely made up, but the condensing of forming the Fellowship during The Council can be argued as being necessary. While no oath was placed on how long someone decided to stay in the Fellowship, that doesn't mean there were no bonds at all. There may not have been an explicit oath, but Frodo's 'charge' was to bear the Ring to it's destruction and I think it can be implied the Fellowship's duty was to help him on his quest. Boromir broke these when he tried to take the Ring by force.
__________________
an eye for an eye leaves everyone blind |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |