![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Blossom of Dwimordene
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The realm of forgotten words
Posts: 10,511
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Great example, Puddleglum! That does explain a lot, doesn't it?
Maybe what Eru stands for in this case really is moral, because I can't say that all the people who had to choose between loyalties knew about Eru. Or at least know enough about Eru. They did follow their morals, though. I know that there are different morals, but the point I'm trying to prove is right vs wrong in a person's (dog's?) head
__________________
You passed from under darkened dome, you enter now the secret land. - Take me to Finrod's fabled home!... ~ Finrod: The Rock Opera |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Wight
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 145
![]() |
Quote:
I think the key point is that it is *NOT* sufficient that one simply "follow their morals" to be justified. In Tolkien's world (I'll avoid discussing our primary world to reduce controversy) Eru is real and the creator from whom all existence derives - and justification depends on *HIS* (if you will, tho I don't think I'd normally phrase it that way) "morals". One person (or dog ![]() If/When Eru (or the Valar/Mandos) judge a Fea (spirit) they may well consider "I honestly thought I was doing what you would say is right" as a mitigating factor - maybe even a fully mitigating factor. But I think the Fea (spirit) would still have to come in submission to their judgment, acknowledging their right and authority to pass the final judgment. BTW, I'm using "Fea" here a bit loosely since it was a matter of uncertainty even to Tolkien (for a time) whether Huan had a Fea (as an incarnated spirit) or was merely an intelligent animal. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blossom of Dwimordene
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The realm of forgotten words
Posts: 10,511
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 loyalties
The way I understand your post, Puddleglum, is that there are actually 3 different loyalties - to Eru, to a master/authority, and to one's heart. I'd say that very often two of these are against one.
Gaima has an interesting case. He says something like "when in doubt, wisdom tells us to follow our hearts" when Gandalf refuses to give his staff to him. The 2 loyalties in conflict are to master and to heart; you don't see much of Eru here, though. You could say that since Gaima followed his heart and that caused good things to happen (ie Gandalf "woke" Theoden) and ultimately do what Eru wants, the Eru loyalty was the same as the heart one. You could prove otherwise too, though. Huan, on the other hand, has a clear case. His heart loyalty and Eru loyalty tell him to betray Celegorm, but his master loyalty says the opposite. It's 2 to one. Maglor had a 2 to 1 choice too, though, and he chose the one, when he listened to Maedhros and stole one of the Silmarils, killing other people in the process (a bit of the Silmarillion, like Ibrin said). Interesting thing, loyalty...can cause so much trouble...
__________________
You passed from under darkened dome, you enter now the secret land. - Take me to Finrod's fabled home!... ~ Finrod: The Rock Opera |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Dead Serious
|
Quote:
As far as Middle-earth goes (like Puddleglum I will avoid straying into "the real world"), I am strongly leery of saying anything like "one should have a loyalty to one's heart." This is not to say that the heart does not play a role in loyalty, but I do not think it really deserves a "third loyalty." Rather, the promptings of the heart (which sounds terribly melodramatic, by the way), are more in the nature of the conscience, which helps one distinguish between sworn loyalty and morality (loyalty to Eru, one might say) when the two seem to conflict. This does not, however, mean that you do the right thing by "staying loyal to your heart," introducing a third morality; rather, a properly formed conscience will prioritize loyalty to Eru, and prompt one to act according. If one has an undue loyalty to the heart that causes one to deviate from proper loyalty to Eru (ie. to what is "right"), whether that is in order to be loyal to a sworn loyalty or some third party action, that is IMmoral, and to attempt to make it moral on the basis of "loyalty to the heart" is not really given much--or any--support in Tolkien's writings.
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Blossom of Dwimordene
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The realm of forgotten words
Posts: 10,511
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I've only read the translation of LOTR, so I wrote the name like it sounds in there. I'm sorry that I got the wrong spelling and pronounciation (darn these stupid translators who changed everything!). It is probably Hama. He is the one who told Gandalf, Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli to put down all their weapons at the doorstep of Meduseld; he died during the battle in Hornburg while defending the gates.
__________________
You passed from under darkened dome, you enter now the secret land. - Take me to Finrod's fabled home!... ~ Finrod: The Rock Opera |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Wight
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 145
![]() |
Quote:
Which translation? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |