![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
RB-SE-04:
I agree to your suggestion how to deal with the redundancy. But I am not sure that we could not still use 'Fauglith'. The full name was Dor-na-Fauglith 'Land of the Gasping Dust'. Anfauglith would then be 'The Gasping Dust' and Fauglith simply 'Gasping Dust'. Respectfuly Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Newly Deceased
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 10
![]() |
Quote:
But something different: how are the changes of the course of events in the Shibboleth generally treated? In this case Fingon's kingship of the Noldor... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Kingship of Fingon: I do not think that we must make a change for that. The sentence does allow the kingship that Fingon took up to be only that of the Noldor in Hithlum. Other wise we could simply skip 'of the Noldor', if that is thought to be better.
Respectfuly Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Wight
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 247
![]() |
One thing:
I don't know if this was discussed in another thread, but although the professor himself wrote in LQ that Thorondor was living in Crissaegrin, for some reason (I suppose due to the allusion in UT, earlier than the revision of the QS) I had taken the decision of place the home of Eagles in Thangorodrim and from the dead of Fingolfin tell that the eagles started living in Crissaegrin. It would be easier for Thorondor and more coherent, that came from Thangorodrim than Crissaegrin, much further. Perhaps the professor careless forgot it, when revising QS. What do you think? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Newly Deceased
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 10
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
RB-DF-03.5: Ekimeniso's argument about which 'silver' to retain is persuasive, so let's keep the first 'silver' and remove the second.
RB-DF-04: Actually, I don't think that the mixed metaphor (tower vs. storm) in itself is a problem, since Tolkien himself uses both of these images in QS. However, I don't think that adding the detail of Fingolfin as a lonely tree to the storm-metaphor is adequate justification for editing Tolkien's prose on so fine a level. I say pick either the QS or GA version of the passage and use that - and my inclination is to use QS since it is the fuller account and the base text for the sentences immediately before and after. RB-DF-04.5: I have no problem with adding the detail of the echo from GA. Findegil proposes: Quote:
Quote:
RB-DF-09: In QS, the flight of the Beorians and the situation of Barahir and his twelve companions is told (QS §138-139) just after the rescue of Felagund, significantly before the account of Fingolfin's death. In GA, the narrative turns away from Barahir after the rescue of Felagund and only comes back to him and his people after telling of Fingolfin's death (in GA §158-159). The solution adopted in Findegil's text is to retain QS §138 where it stands, remove §139, and then insert GA §158-159 after the death of Fingolfin. This seems to me to be problematic. Even though we have deleted QS §139, there is still redundancy between §138 and GA §158-159; the flight of most of Barahir's people and the transformation of the highland forest into the dreadful Taur-nu-Fuin are both repeated. I think we should pick one place or the other and put all the material about Barahir there - so either remove QS §138-139 or remove GA §158-159, and make any appropriate additions to the retained version from the removed version. I would propose to remove QS §138-139 and use GA §158-159 after the death of Fingolfin: Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
RB-DF-03.5: Agreed.
RB-DF-04: Well, metaphors are a stylistic devices, therefor this change is one for style and not for any substance. RB-DF-04.2: Agreed. RB-DF-07.5: Okay, so what about this: Quote:
About The Shibboleth and how we deal with it: I do not remember that we ever discussed some of the matters that Ekimeniso brought up. When ever we made use of that work, we used the ideas given their (like the death of Amras in the burning ship). 'The rule of thump' (is this really an english proverb? it sounds very de{utssch-e}nglish to me) is rule 2.b): Quote:
For the case of the high-kingship i would suggest: Quote:
I think that this story was rejected by JRR Tolkien. But I have to look that up. Respectfuly Findegil Last edited by Findegil; 01-24-2011 at 03:09 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Thorondor on Thangorodrim:
The former discussion on this point was very brief but it took place in this the thread about Tuor and his coming to Gondolin. The conclusion was to keep the dwelling on Thangorodrim but to be ambigiuse about time and reason for the remove to Crisseagrim. This decission was take especilly because of the passage after the fall of Fingolfin in LQS, were Thorondor comes from Crisseagrim. Respectfuly Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |