![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Gondowe proposed the follwing change in the thread about general changes:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Findegil |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Wight
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 248
![]() |
OK its right, but the complete sentence I had inserted in the General guide of names at the end of the Vol 3. And a nice place could be better when he is described in the passage from "Of the rings of Power". That in my version is part of the subchapter "Of the Return of Sauron" from the part II "Middle Earth" of the First Part "The Second Age" of that Vol 3.
Greetings. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
As I work through these text again I found some points missing:
Quote:
From the passage about Tulkas: Quote:
Quote:
Respectfuly Findegil |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Wight
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 248
![]() |
Ok in everything, I think that the last sentence must be reinserted, it was written by Tolkien and as you said there's no reason to remove it.
Greetings |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
![]() |
Regarding Fin's response to Arcus' first three additions, it is true that Tolkien moved toward a much more structured and delineated approach for this chapter (Elizabeth Whittingham has a good discussion of this in her "Evolution Of Tolkien's Mythology: A Study of the History of Middle-earth"). Maybe we could introduce the lesser spirits later? In Chapter 1, which is where it seems the descriptions of the dwellings were moved? I haven't reviewed that chapter yet, I will see if it makes sense there.
What about the other addition Arcus suggested in 1? Quote:
4) I have problems with this addition. The idea that "all must bow before her" (emphasis mine) and that she is the "mistress of death" does not seem to fit with her character in the revisions, in which she becomes the goddess of pity and compassion and strength and wisdom. 5) and 6) I think these additions work well, especially if these other names are used later. Regarding Vala-07.2 why not just: Quote:
Regarding Vala-07, the comment about Olorin being humble, I think we should remove the apostrophes as we are not quoting anybody. Last edited by gandalf85; 02-11-2019 at 07:29 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
1) Vala-02.45: The addition about Varda from MT is okay for me.
4) Vala-04.3: I think the attributes of being a death goddess were lost for Niënna in the later legendary. So I agree to gandalf85 that this addition is critical. 5) Vala-05.25: Of these names only ‘Tuivána’ is used later. Nonetheless the adition could be considered. 6) Vala-06: Ómar is used later, so we could add him, but I think it was by intention that the sub-chapter ends with Olorin. Vala-07.23b: In thah way it would mean that Eru was a created power, which is not true. Vala-07: I am okay with removing the apostrophes. Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Perhaps "He was the greatest power created by Eru."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Vala:
That dosn’t sound right either to me, since it would suggest that there were other creators. To be honest, I do not see the need to remove the redundance between the text and the footnote. It is not a full redundance; otherwise the footnote would useless. In the way it stands the footnote does make the message more specific. Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|