John Boorman's Lord of the Rings

[Inziladun]

Originally Posted by Elmo

He moved to Ireland though.

Which from my point of view counts as "beyond the sundering sea".

[Lalwendë]

Originally Posted by Inziladun

Which from my point of view counts as "beyond the sundering sea".

So that would make Liverpool the Grey Havens?

Which it kind of was for a time in the mid 1800s...

Originally Posted by Nerwen

This thread rather perplexes me, I must say. I don't want to pick fights with anyone who has posted here– many of them are people whose opinion I value, in fact– but I can't feeling there is quite a double standard at work, in some cases. I mean, some of the same people who are furious at PJ's cavalier attitude to the source material are here praising John Boorman precisely for having *no* respect for it whatever. Just a bit of a contradiction there, surely?

I still think what I used to think on this - it would have been fun, but only once an attempt at a serious adaptation was out of the way (because like it or not, that's what Jackson attempted). And I think it might have been fun because I really love Excalibur, despite that taking liberties left, right and centre and occasionally being extremely silly and pompous.

In a small voice and without use of a wooden spoon...can I say that Ken Russell might have made an amusing and silly version too?

[Inziladun]

Originally Posted by Lalwendë

So that would make Liverpool the Grey Havens?

Well, it is the place from whence the Four Wizards came.

[Lalwendë]

Originally Posted by Inziladun

Well, it is the place from whence the Four Wizards came.

And also, the Blue Wizards