Three Times The Hobbit?

[Kuruharan]

This is one of the most scathing reviews I have seen yet. The critic pulls no punches and is direct and blunt, even though I completely disagree with his assessment that the LOTR film trilogy was a marvel of cinematic triumph.

[edit] Its...uhh...actually the Atlantic Wire...and I am hoist yet again by the inability to edit headings

[alatar]

Originally Posted by Atlantic Wire

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, is such a sullenly, basely commercial and junky affair, a movie that feels not crafted with Jackson's seemingly divine inspiration...

Melkor perhaps?

[davem]

Guardian reckons its too long http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmb...obbit-too-long

I'm being 'taken' to see it & one thing I'm not looking forward to is the three hour running time. I'd be less bothered by it being made into three movies if they were three 90 minute movies. I'm old enough to remember when most films were 90 minutes (apart from the odd Gone With the Wind/Laurence of Arabia) & most books were around the 200 page mark, & I enjoyed them much more. Seems like the advent of the word processor did for reasonable sized novels & computer graphics & video did for reasonable length films.

[Inziladun]

Originally Posted by davem

I'm not looking forward to is the three hour running time. I'd be less bothered by it being made into three movies if they were three 90 minute movies. I'm old enough to remember when most films were 90 minutes (apart from the odd Gone With the Wind/Laurence of Arabia) & most books were around the 200 page mark, & I enjoyed them much more. Seems like the advent of the word processor did for reasonable sized novels & computer graphics & video did for reasonable length films.

Three hours? Seriously? All other critiques aside, I honestly don't know if I can handle that. I'm absolutely riddled with ADD, and it especially rears its head when I'm faced with a task I don't enjoy.

[davem]

Originally Posted by Inziladun

Three hours? Seriously? All other critiques aside, I honestly don't know if I can handle that. I'm absolutely riddled with ADD, and it especially rears its head when I'm faced with a task I don't enjoy.

Two hours and fifty minutes. In the past they'd have an intermission with long films. I suspect its about getting you to go twice to see the bit you missed when your bladder gave out during the first viewing.

[alatar]

Originally Posted by davem

I'm being 'taken' to see it

Sorry; can't help seeing visions of a trussed and gagged davem in the theater.

Two hours and fifty minutes. In the past they'd have an intermission with long films. I suspect its about getting you to go twice to see the bit you missed when your bladder gave out during the first viewing.

I remember similar discussions for LotR run times. Movies with longer run times can generate less revenue as they can be shown fewer times during the day.

Surely the industry knows this and has somehow compensated (bigger theaters, more showings, some other plan).

[Bêthberry]

Originally Posted by Kuruharan

[edit] Its...uhh...actually the Atlantic Wire...and I am hoist yet again by the inability to edit headings

Kuru, if you go to "Advanced Edit" you can change the title.

Originally Posted by alatar

Hoot! Maybe this is PJ's plan to make us all much fonder of LotR.

I do like eternal optimists.

Originally Posted by davem

I'm being 'taken' to see it

Do remember you can vent here if not domestically.

[Kuruharan]

Originally Posted by Bêthberry

Kuru, if you go to "Advanced Edit" you can change the title.

Huh...I didn't know that.

I'll leave it as it is now since everyone has seen it.