![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||||
|
Newly Deceased
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
One has to wonder what exactly makes her the equal of Feanor and the greatest besides him, I don´t think it is only her wisedom, for Feanor was not wise at all, so it´s not hard to be wiser than him. Regarding the topic theme, while Glorfindels power was greatly enhanced, I still see no evidence that he is spiritually more potent or "greater" than Galadriel. Tolkien never stated it explicitly that Glorfindel was the greatest or mightiest in something, only that he was almost equal to a Maia, I think that applies to other elves like Feanor, Fingolfon or Finrod (if we look at their deeds) and Galadriel as well. Tolkien however stated several times Galadriel being extraordinary among the Eldar. Be it her hair, her marvellous gift of insight into the minds of others or her commanding stature already in Valinor (and that while still being the youngst Noldor princess, with her brothers and uncles, cousins and of course her father/grandfathers around. Sure all the royals had something to say, but the fact that in Galadriels case it is mentioned so explicitly makes me believe that she was indeed as respected as Feanor was). In respect to Glorfindel and Galadriel, they were never compared, so one can only assume. The Witchking was afraid of Glorfindel so he was of Galadriel. (there is something along the lines that he would not dare to enter Lorien yet and face the white ring and Lorien would anyway stand unless Sauron would come in person. Of Glorfindel it is said that Quote:
Quote:
I don´t get is, it always seems as if Galadriels talents must be somehow limited because she is female, always when it is discussed on why she is called greatest besides Feanor it is argued that she is only greatest among elven women or that her greatnes is wisedom. IMHO Tolkien made it pretty clear who the 3 greatest of Erus children are (greatnes for me includes spiritual might, the ability to do magic, Finrod singing songs of power, Luthien putting Morgoth to sleep for example, besides other things) and that are Luthien, Feanor and Galadriel. In that order. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 276
![]() |
Quote:
That being said Glorfindel is a very special case and the quotes about him put him in his own league. Before his death, Galadriel was probably a greater power, but not after he returned. Glorfindel having the special responsibility of being sent back to help against Sauron speaks volumes for his power. Even Tolkien had to explain exactly why he had an air of power so unique for an elf. Luthien with her divine heritage stands alone. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,039
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
One thing I've wondered is why Glorfindel was chosen for re-embodiment over, say, Finrod. Was Glorfindel's fight with the Balrog somehow more of a sacrifice than Finrod's contest with Sauron? Was the decision tied to the relative degree of inferiority of Glorfindel vs. the Balrog, ie Glorfindel was taking more of a risk?
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||
|
Newly Deceased
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
I think IF Gorfindel would be standing out that much Tolkien would have mentioned that more direct and not only stating that his spiritial power has been greatly enhanced and at the same time stating that Galadriel was not to beat in spiritual power. I think many elves that were rebodied would have that special air of power and almost angelic glow, only Glordindel happend to return. And by the way Inziladun, Finrod was re-embodied. He walks with his father in Eldamar. Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Willemijn; 01-05-2014 at 09:50 PM. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||||
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 276
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Here is a simple comparison. Ancalagon the Black was more powerful than Melian, but in the end Earendil killed it. Earedil was called the mightiest of the Half-Elven, which means he was more powerful than Elrond an equal of Galadriel at the very least. Quote:
OK, maybe she wasn´t that good a warrior but who was better in wisedom or song/magic (besides Luthien)? I think in wisedom, songs/magic, she reaces the peak of the pyramid, maybe even in crafting (besides Feanor) if we take the starglass and the mirror into consideration.[/QUOTE] No she doesn't. Her displays of magic are not above those of Elwing, Feanor, Elrond or arguably her brother Luthien. The statements you have made are completely made up. In Lore Elrond was the mightiest. In foresight it was Cirdan. At music it was Daeron. At crafting it was Feanor. She is not even a close second in either of these categories. Ironically Galadriel was probably a better warrior than she was a craftsman, singer or healer. Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Wisest of the Noldor
|
I believe the Galadriel/Feanor quotation referred to several times, but never posted, is one of these two:
Quote:
Quote:
And now, a general comment: it’s best not to get too combative over Tolkien’s use of superlatives. Yes, at some points he'll describe a given character as “the wisest”, or “the fairest” or “the greatest”– but at other times he describes other characters the same way. No doubt– writing as he did over a period of decades– he sometimes forgot what he’d said previously– or else he just didn't mean these statements in the spirit of utter literalism in which people often appear to take them. I know some see ways out of these apparent contradictions, but those seem to me to rely on hair-splitting and not-very-well-founded assumptions. For example, where is the evidence that Tolkien always meant completely different things by “might” and “greatness”? I just feel there’s quite a bit of circular reasoning going on here.
__________________
"Even Nerwen wasn't evil in the beginning." –Elmo. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Wisest of the Noldor
|
Also– the problem with all these power debates and “vs” threads is that the questions they ask are outside the scope of the type of fiction Tolkien wrote. I mean, you’d need him to have written up little character sheets for everyone, with their ability scores and hit points and everything. Okay, well, he didn’t.
And if I sound condescending, well, sorry, but I do think this stuff is pretty silly and it strikes me that some people are taking it all just a bit too seriously.
__________________
"Even Nerwen wasn't evil in the beginning." –Elmo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,036
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
In the 1930s Tolkien wrote: 'Of these Feanor was the mightiest in skill of word and hand, more learned in lore than his brethren; in his heart his spirit burned as flame. Fingolfin was the strongest, the most steadfast, and the most valiant. Finrod was the fairest, and the most wise of heart.' (Quenta Silmarillion) Then in the early 1950s Tolkien wrote (Annals of Aman): 'For Feanor was made the mightiest in all parts of body and mind: in valour, in endurance, in beauty, in understanding, in skill, in strength and subtelty alike: of all the Children of Eru, and a bright flame was in him.' But yet in the 1950s Tolkien keeps the first passage, even changing Finrod to Finarfin and extending the last sentence (so we know he simply didn't overlook this). If Feanor is the mightiest 'in valour', how then is Fingolfin the most valiant? or if 'in strength' why then is Fingolfin the strongest? Or if 'in beauty' why then is Finarfin the fairest? Is this a matter of authorship and opinion? The Annals of Aman were said to be written by Rumil in the Elder Days, and held in memory by the Exiles, and parts remembered were set down in Numenor before the Shadow fell upon it. Could it be that one author esteemed Feanor so highly, while another rather noted the greatness of Fingolfin and Finarfin in certain areas? Hmm... ahem [cough] or something else ![]() In any event, here's what Tolkien added (and thus published himself) to the second edition of 1965 (in Appendix A): 'Feanor was the greatest of the Eldar in arts and lore, but also the proudest and most self-willed.' Last edited by Galin; 01-06-2014 at 07:15 AM. Reason: none of your beeswax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||||
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Deepest Forges of Ered Luin
Posts: 733
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
You might have missed where I've declared myself a Galadriel fan, btw. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You asserted, however, that "she [Galadriel], Feanor, and Luthien were the greatest of the elves in the history of Arda". That's a bit different than being extraordinary.
__________________
Even as fog continues to lie in the valleys, so does ancient sin cling to the low places, the depression in the world consciousness. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 276
![]() |
Quote:
That being said greatness and power are not interchangeable for Tolkien. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Deepest Forges of Ered Luin
Posts: 733
![]() |
That makes more sense. And it reinforces the quote I posted about her being "mightest" of the Noldor in the 3rd Age.
__________________
Even as fog continues to lie in the valleys, so does ancient sin cling to the low places, the depression in the world consciousness. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 276
![]() |
Quote:
It's harder to define what he means by greatness, but it is a combination of social standing, achievement, power and respect. Tolkien only describing her as the mightiest Noldor to remain the 3rd Age means there was at least one other Noldor more powerful. Feanor for certain, but I am not sure the other Noldor princes were. There is no definitive answer, for this though. Earendil for sure was more powerful, but he does not count as a Noldor. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|