![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 276
![]() |
Quote:
That being said Glorfindel is a very special case and the quotes about him put him in his own league. Before his death, Galadriel was probably a greater power, but not after he returned. Glorfindel having the special responsibility of being sent back to help against Sauron speaks volumes for his power. Even Tolkien had to explain exactly why he had an air of power so unique for an elf. Luthien with her divine heritage stands alone. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,042
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
One thing I've wondered is why Glorfindel was chosen for re-embodiment over, say, Finrod. Was Glorfindel's fight with the Balrog somehow more of a sacrifice than Finrod's contest with Sauron? Was the decision tied to the relative degree of inferiority of Glorfindel vs. the Balrog, ie Glorfindel was taking more of a risk?
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||||
|
Newly Deceased
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
I think IF Gorfindel would be standing out that much Tolkien would have mentioned that more direct and not only stating that his spiritial power has been greatly enhanced and at the same time stating that Galadriel was not to beat in spiritual power. I think many elves that were rebodied would have that special air of power and almost angelic glow, only Glordindel happend to return. And by the way Inziladun, Finrod was re-embodied. He walks with his father in Eldamar. Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Willemijn; 01-05-2014 at 09:50 PM. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 276
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Here is a simple comparison. Ancalagon the Black was more powerful than Melian, but in the end Earendil killed it. Earedil was called the mightiest of the Half-Elven, which means he was more powerful than Elrond an equal of Galadriel at the very least. Quote:
OK, maybe she wasn´t that good a warrior but who was better in wisedom or song/magic (besides Luthien)? I think in wisedom, songs/magic, she reaces the peak of the pyramid, maybe even in crafting (besides Feanor) if we take the starglass and the mirror into consideration.[/QUOTE] No she doesn't. Her displays of magic are not above those of Elwing, Feanor, Elrond or arguably her brother Luthien. The statements you have made are completely made up. In Lore Elrond was the mightiest. In foresight it was Cirdan. At music it was Daeron. At crafting it was Feanor. She is not even a close second in either of these categories. Ironically Galadriel was probably a better warrior than she was a craftsman, singer or healer. Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Wisest of the Noldor
|
I believe the Galadriel/Feanor quotation referred to several times, but never posted, is one of these two:
Quote:
Quote:
And now, a general comment: it’s best not to get too combative over Tolkien’s use of superlatives. Yes, at some points he'll describe a given character as “the wisest”, or “the fairest” or “the greatest”– but at other times he describes other characters the same way. No doubt– writing as he did over a period of decades– he sometimes forgot what he’d said previously– or else he just didn't mean these statements in the spirit of utter literalism in which people often appear to take them. I know some see ways out of these apparent contradictions, but those seem to me to rely on hair-splitting and not-very-well-founded assumptions. For example, where is the evidence that Tolkien always meant completely different things by “might” and “greatness”? I just feel there’s quite a bit of circular reasoning going on here.
__________________
"Even Nerwen wasn't evil in the beginning." –Elmo. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Wisest of the Noldor
|
Also– the problem with all these power debates and “vs” threads is that the questions they ask are outside the scope of the type of fiction Tolkien wrote. I mean, you’d need him to have written up little character sheets for everyone, with their ability scores and hit points and everything. Okay, well, he didn’t.
And if I sound condescending, well, sorry, but I do think this stuff is pretty silly and it strikes me that some people are taking it all just a bit too seriously.
__________________
"Even Nerwen wasn't evil in the beginning." –Elmo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,036
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
In the 1930s Tolkien wrote: 'Of these Feanor was the mightiest in skill of word and hand, more learned in lore than his brethren; in his heart his spirit burned as flame. Fingolfin was the strongest, the most steadfast, and the most valiant. Finrod was the fairest, and the most wise of heart.' (Quenta Silmarillion) Then in the early 1950s Tolkien wrote (Annals of Aman): 'For Feanor was made the mightiest in all parts of body and mind: in valour, in endurance, in beauty, in understanding, in skill, in strength and subtelty alike: of all the Children of Eru, and a bright flame was in him.' But yet in the 1950s Tolkien keeps the first passage, even changing Finrod to Finarfin and extending the last sentence (so we know he simply didn't overlook this). If Feanor is the mightiest 'in valour', how then is Fingolfin the most valiant? or if 'in strength' why then is Fingolfin the strongest? Or if 'in beauty' why then is Finarfin the fairest? Is this a matter of authorship and opinion? The Annals of Aman were said to be written by Rumil in the Elder Days, and held in memory by the Exiles, and parts remembered were set down in Numenor before the Shadow fell upon it. Could it be that one author esteemed Feanor so highly, while another rather noted the greatness of Fingolfin and Finarfin in certain areas? Hmm... ahem [cough] or something else ![]() In any event, here's what Tolkien added (and thus published himself) to the second edition of 1965 (in Appendix A): 'Feanor was the greatest of the Eldar in arts and lore, but also the proudest and most self-willed.' Last edited by Galin; 01-06-2014 at 07:15 AM. Reason: none of your beeswax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||||
|
Newly Deceased
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
With Luthien and Feanor it´s clear that they are magically superiour to her but with Finrod I disagree, sure disguising himself and his companions or singing a song of power and almost winning against Sauron is impressive, but evidence is that Galadriel is greater than him so that puts her above him. Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 276
![]() |
Quote:
When there is conflicting notes about, who is say the mightiest or oldest then at best we can make a iudgement call. For instance both Fangorn and Tom are called the oldest, but we know that the Ents were in some part made by Yavanna. The Hobbit is definite one work where we have to take into account that the 'author' Bilbo was very biased and probably not aware of what was really going on. We even have evidence that he has already lied in the book deliberately. Even the LOTR is from the hobbit's POV. Advanced medical treatment would be seen as magic by the Hobbits. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|