WW CVI: Tol-in-Westeros Game Thread

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

I want someone, or more than one person, to explain in just a few sentences why Kitanna was suddenly top suspect yesterday. That whole situation was strange to me. I recall someone (was it Nogrod?) claiming that her death would give us answers, or at least better info. I'm not sure why. Sure, Kit always has a slightly sneaky style of play, but what does that matter?

That's mostly what I'm interested in today. I find the night-kills to be of limited interest since the Seer is no longer here.

Links to Mac are what's gonna catch us lions.

Sally and Boro better have explanations for their weirdness.

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

Day 1: Gil voted for Boro. No vote from Cop.
Day 2: Cop voted for Eomer (me). Gil voted Mac.
Day 3: Gil voted Lommy. Cop voted Kit.

Make of that what you will.

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

Sorry for triple posting, but you can't edit in WW.

So Cop as a no trace kill from the bear.

Gil to set up Lommy, or bluff from Lommy?

[Inziladun]

Originally Posted by Eomer of the Rohirrim

I want someone, or more than one person, to explain in just a few sentences why Kitanna was suddenly top suspect yesterday. That whole situation was strange to me. I recall someone (was it Nogrod?) claiming that her death would give us answers, or at least better info. I'm not sure why. Sure, Kit always has a slightly sneaky style of play, but what does that matter?

For me it was her safe-looking votes, coupled with the appearance that she seemed to be one of the more quiet ones.

Originally Posted by Eomer of the Rohirrim

I find the night-kills to be of limited interest since the Seer is no longer here.

Well, they might give us a window into what the Lions and Bear are looking for, but you're right in that there's limited value there.

x/d with Eomer x 2

[Nogrod]

Originally Posted by Eomer of the Rohirrim

I want someone, or more than one person, to explain in just a few sentences why Kitanna was suddenly top suspect yesterday. That whole situation was strange to me.

If not a red flag, then at least an orange one here.

No innocent knew yesterDay that Kit is as innocent. Instead there were multiple reasons why it looked she was a pretty decent candidate for being in cahoots with MacLion. So the kind of smug "would someone tell me why" -attitude kind of jumps out... I mean yes, you can make a comment if you have strongly disagreed with others about a mass-lynch the earlier Day (especially if you had expressed your reasons openly beforehand when the end-result was not known) and if you have showed some reasons why you were correct the Day before, you might even pressure others to explain why they thought their reasons were better than yours - the Day before.

And in that case, you might look forwards for others to have some respect for your sharpness... But this case looks nothing like that. On the contrary. A wolf did know already yesterDay Kit was not one of them so a wolf could afford the smugness.

That is not to say that no lion voted for Kitanna. It is possible, if not probable at least one of them did as it would have been a nice and easy place to hide.

But I'd quess they'd both not do that. Let's call that an educated hunch (it's nothing more - but having been a wolf on several games I know they normally, on average, wish to act a bit differently).


An other thing that caught my eye toDay was Encai and her interpretations... I'll be back with them later as I see people have been posting.