![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Laws and custom joined with The Converse of Manwë and Eru were in my 'plan' part of volume 3: THE LORE OF THE WISE.
As for farther additions from The Shibboleth of Fëanor: They are in part contradicting the Story line of The Later Silmarillion. Since I think (please cross check) that SF is the later source, we might have to change big parts of this chapter again. Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tol Morwen
Posts: 380
![]() |
"Shibboleth" is certainly later. From around 1968. Problem is (perhaps not that much of a problem, if we manage to find a convincing solution) that the "Shibboleth" has the greater 144 solar years = 1 Valian year. So if Fëanor was born in YT 1169 and Míriel died in YT 1170, by that greater number, Fëanor could have still grown to an adult by the time of Míriel's death.
Of course, one could argue that if are going to take the lower number (9.58 solar years = 1 Valian year), Fëanor COULD (theoretically) have grown to an "adult", so to speak - c. 20 of our years is the greatest figure for Fëanor's age at the time of Míriel's death. However, it is said that the Elves do not reach their full physical stature until the age of 50, and are not fully mature until 100 years of age. Again, Fëanor could be an exception to the rule - he is, after all, called the "Spirit of Fire" by his mother, and it doesn't seem so unlikely (at least to me) that he could have achieved his full stature (at least physically) by this time. Then again, you could also argue that by "fully grown" he was fully grown MENTALLY. OR you could just abandon the notion of Elven children maturing more slowly than mortal children (physically). In any case, there are many possible "solutions", and I think that the information given in the "Shibboleth" contains some vital character motivations behind Fëanor's later actions - especially his mother's use of "th" as opposed to the later general change to "s" - after all, the essay IS called the "Shibboleth of Fëanor".
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
The change in the calculations of times is a more general point. We should probably discuss that in a thread of it own. In our text we can avoid being specific with any numbers of years or other units.
Since DoV realy is the first chapter that the project worked on conclusivly, a re-check for other possible additions especially from younger sources (as SF) is for sure needed. But for the time being I think the group has opened enough indeepth discussions. The detailed discussion of the possible merger of texts including [b]SF[7b] has to wait. Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Ok, I have read throught the proposed changes by Findegil and Maedhros, and I have some comments.
Of Finwe and Miriel I have only two comments for this section. Firstly, I at first wondered why the (far more substantial) Statute of Finwe and Miriel text was not used throughout to greatly expand this section, but I noticed that the very same text is referenced in the chapter itself. This made me think that these additions were not added bc the Statute is to be included along with Laws and Customs in VOLUME III: THE LORE OF THE WISE. If this is so, then I wholeheartedly agree. If, however, this is not to be included later, then I see no reason not to give the much fuller accounts here. Secondly, In DoV-FM-03 I was confused as to the reason for the inclusion of this portion of the Statute. As there were no other inclusions, this seemed odd as the singular exception, and indeed turns the footnote into a full page of text. In addition, there was no direction by Tolkien to include this account here, so I am confused as to why it was done. Of Feanor and the Unchaining of Melkor in the paragraph of DoV-UM-03 there was a change to LQ that was left out of your version: Quote:
Quote:
I made an addition from AAm: Quote:
Quote:
Of the Darkening of Valinor I just have a question. Is it Ungoliante or Ungoliant? Also, in the LQ version, Ungoliant and Melkor split up, but in all others they remain together and kill the trees as a unit. is LQ the way to go? Minor note: Quote:
DoV-DV-03: at the end of this paragraph is the bit: Quote:
DoV-DV-05: This bit is odd, but it might be better to simply remove it. Feanor is the only one of the Noldor who would require the clemency of Manwe, and his presence is told later. Of the Rape of the Silmarils DoV-RS-04: The words "in Aman" should be added, as it is elsewhere said that the Elves had been killed in the hither lands, which is why Orome brought them weapons. Of the Thieves' Quarrel Looks good! That was everything I saw, the rest looks good. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
just putting in a reminder here that the Shibboleth additions about Sarmo must be removed, due to their inclusion in chapter 6.
In addition, the addition of the draining of Kullulin and Silindrin in the Darkening of Valinor section. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
And we have to remove Celeborn from the addition that descrips Galadriels stay in Aqualondë.
Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Where was this addition made? I saw no post about it on this thread.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|