![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
VT-LQ-04b, VT-LT-06 & VT-LT-11.5: Yeah, I suppose it is plausible for them to be within the gardens of Vana and Lorien and still near Ezellohar. It still feels a little - I don't know, too convenient, perhaps. But that's just a feeling, not an argument.
Quote:
VT-LT-06: Since we've already told in the Valaquenta that his right name is Irmo but that he is called Lorien after his gardens, I don't think we need to repeat it here. So I'd opt rather for: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
VT-EX-30.1: My preference would also be to keep her explicitly a Maia of Vana, but I don't feel particularly strongly about it. |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
VT-LQ-04b, VT-LT-06 & VT-LT-11.5: "seldom" does solve the issue for Silindirin:
Quote:
Quote:
VT-LT-13: Since Beren was meet by Lúthien in Mandos, it can not be the coming of Men to Mandos that is in question but the hall (in LT named Fui). I don't see that the hall described fits the later Nienna's dwelling place. So what about this: Quote:
Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
VT-LT-11.7: How about:
Quote:
VT-LT-14: I can certainly agree to Nienna still distilling tears, but I'm having a hard time convincing myself about the clouds, and it seems very awkward to me to repeat a phrase directly from the Valaquenta here. I'm not sure I have a solution, though, without dropping Nienna from the descriptions here. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Agreed to everything so far, and Aiwendil's suggestion for the Cululin edit looks good.
VT-LT-14: I see no real issue with repeating from the Valaquenta, and I think that something must be said about her in this list, as she is one of the most important ones. As it is, the only ones who have nothing said here about their dwellings are Vaire and Este, the two least important of the Valar. Nienna is much more important, and I think to leave her out would be worse than repeating something small. I might even do more: Quote:
Last edited by ArcusCalion; 11-04-2017 at 11:48 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
I actually have another point I just saw. In the mater of elvish reincarnation, this LT passage about the fate of Men is actually surprisingly applicable:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
VT-LT-11.7: Agreed.
VT-LT-14: It seems our opinions are fare sundered. Let's sort the discussion: 1. Mentioning Nienna at this point: We all agree that it would be good to mention her, but the only thing we agreed upon so fare are the destilling of tears. 2. The clouds of grief: ArcusCalion and I find this acceptable, but Aiwendil has a problem with this. 3. The hall in LT called Fui: Aiwendil and I agree that this should in our version be a description the special hall in Mandos in which Námo gathers the fëa of Men. But ArcusCalion would like to use the description for the dwelling of Nienna. 4. Snipets of Valaquenta used here again or moved to here: Aiwendil is complete against it, ArcusCalion would repeat the passages in question, and I would move them. In the end Aiwendil's point of view is the safest and has to rule. I search the older version of the former chapter "Of the Valar": But what is in there is either not useable or virtually the same as in the Valaquenta. I have no solution ready for these points, but it might be helpful to sort them. LT passage about the fate of Men: This is for sure a no go. On the one hand I don't think the passages realy fit the rehousing of Elves, since we are told that Manwe was the one to give the Elves the new boddy and it would be a case changing the sense of Tolkiens text greatly with out changing the words over much - for sure that is not wanted. Respectfully Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
I would say that Fui is not a requirement for me. I do not feel too strongly about dropping it. As for the description, I certainly do not want to use it for Nienna, I removed that part in my suggestion. I would say that we cannot move the Valaquenta passages without real good reason, which we do not have. I think small repetition is harmless and the best solution to the issue.
As for the Fate of Men passage you are right, I just figured I'd throw it out there. Another side note, I think the chapter should end on a more final note than the description of Nienna's hall, so perhaps we could take up this LT sentence as a way to close out the chapter: Quote:
Last edited by ArcusCalion; 11-05-2017 at 11:51 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |