![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Wight
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 248
![]() |
Well, I suppose that we must make differwnces between gems as raw and jewels as worked pieces.
Greetings |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
To be honest, I think the passage as I inserted it leaves things ambiguous enough that both readings are possible
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Yes, true. I was not arguing for any diffrent editing, I just gave my oppinion about the matter.
Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Found a tiny tidbit again, in the VT41 notes on the Shibboleth:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Okay, I have taken up EPE-EX-34.5 and following gondowe's wish I have looked up the passage corrosponding to AAm year 1149 and would add to it thus (only EPE-EX-04.5 is new):
Quote:
Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
From the note on Belfalas we were just discussing in Of the Rings of Power, I thought we might add in this footnote onto the end of one of the footnotes in this chapter about Cirdan:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Agreed.
Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|