![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Good catch Tyr! I worked only from a scan and never checked the original text. So we can either let the sign stand or change it to 'root'. So I am inclinde to let it stand in this footnote.
ArcusCalion, the * [asterix] form is not really the same as a √ (even so in an artificial language the difference is only a fancy of the author): a √ is found in the recorded past of a language while the * form is only reconstructed by the 'loremasters'. Respectfully Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Fin, this is true but in Q&E the form, for example, *KWENE is used for roots. In the Shibboleth notes on the sons of Feanor, the roots are simply capitalized, like PHIN. However, in Words, Phrases, and Passages, the roots are written with the radical, but the same roots are repeated in Q&E (a later document) with the asterisk, alongside reconstructed forms by loremasters also using an asterisk. Therefore it seems the published texts are inconsistent on the formation of these roots. We should standardize them. As you say, the asterisk is already used for the reconstructed forms, so perhaps we should go with the radical. If that is the case, then I think we need to standardize it across all documents, from the Shibboleth name notes to the Q&E material to the notes on PHAN and the Osanwe. In addition, in every other setting the roots are capitalized, so should we do that here with these two?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
A standardisation is a good idea. And for me capitalisation is the better choice, since it would easiliy allow reconstrucetd roots by asterix and captalisation.
Respectfully Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
While scouring Concerning Galadriel and Celeborn for any more bits I could use, I found something in Appendix E that I figured we were lacking at the moment: the translation and etymology of Celeborn's name. Therefore, as this is his first appearance in the narrative, I figured we could add it in here as a footnote, like so:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
NG-EX-04.93: Agreed.
Respectfully Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Quote:
Last edited by ArcusCalion; 10-08-2018 at 09:07 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
While reading through Beren and Lúthien, I came upon this footnote in the chapter The Return of Beren and Lúthien According to the Quenta Noldorinwa:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by ArcusCalion; 11-04-2018 at 12:55 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |