![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
3) I agree to the use of the '*****' as an editorial distinction, as I think it is enough. I as well agree with keeping Of the Finding of the Ring as a subheading. As to The Broken Bridge see below.
4) Hmm actually seeing it all laid out is indeed very different. I hadn't realized just how short this portion of the adventure was.... Very well, I will agree to the inclusion of these changes, albeit somewhat reluctantly. I do not deny that it is something I had wanted to be able to do somehow when I learned about the 1960 revisions, perhaps to include in the project a 'revised' Hobbit, but I see now that this way is better. Very well Fin, you have won me over ![]() TS-QE-03: Agreed. I must say, after all that whirlwind of confusion, that turned out to be remarkably simple. Well done Fin! Your flowers are most absolutely deserved. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Sorry for not providing these changes at once with my draft, but I was hesitating about them until I had posted the draft:
Quote:
Findegil |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
nice, looks good, some good tidbits!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
![]() |
An impressive amount of work went into this chapter, and it shows. "The Broken Bridge" is a very intimate and detailed telling of the story of the Hobbit up to a certain point, but I think it definitely fits within the scope of the project and I think it works pretty well. It is very Gandalf-focused and feels in sync with the parts from the Quest for Erebor. My comments and additions are fairly minor:
1) Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
3) Not a suggestion, but I think TS-QE-10 is a very clever use of the 1960s Hobbit. 4) Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
6) Quote:
Quote:
I moved a sentence about Gandalf's horse that felt out of place: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by gandalf85; 01-26-2019 at 08:09 PM. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Thank you for your diligence gandalf!
1) This is fine for me. 2) I like this better as well. Agreed. 3) Yes, Fin did a wonderful job. 4) Agreed 5) Is this canon? That Gandalf did not know it was Thrain? I felt that it said he did somewhere. 6) Agreed 7) I like this placing much better. 8) no 8? lol 9) Agreed, nice transition. I would not make that sentence its own paragraph tho, and I would call that addition TS-FR-00.5 and keep the other as is. 10) I like this better, Agreed. 11) Nice find! Agreed. 12) Good catch! Agreed. 13) Thank you! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
![]() |
5) I believe it's canon. In both the Quest of Erebor and the Making of Appendix A, it states he did not know who Thrain was. I will be on the look-out to see if I find this contradicted somewhere.
8) I have a minor in math but apparently cannot count. 11) I was wondering why you guys removed the last bit about the ringbearer, and I think I know why: it's basically a spoiler the way we have it structured. This text was intended to be a "looking back" conversation between Gandalf and the hobbits and Gimli after the War of the Ring. I think it's probably best to remove the last bits about the Ringbearer, but keep the part about Sauron and Smaug helping one another: Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
5) I guess this is one of those times that an assumption becomes so ingrained in our heads we think it's canon! I agree to the change, pending any discovery of contradictory canon info.
11) Ah I missed that. I think it is the right choice to remove it, as Fin had done, so I agree to this change. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |