![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Loremaster of Annúminas
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
![]() ![]() ![]() |
All right:
SAURON -> LEGOLAS, without using ANY members of the Fellowship or Council of Elrond.
__________________
The entire plot of The Lord of the Rings could be said to turn on what Sauron didn’t know, and when he didn’t know it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Spirit of Nen Lalaith
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Meneltarma
Posts: 5,408
![]() |
Sauron>Gil-Galad>Oropher>Thranduil>Legolas
Do I get a cookie?
__________________
Tuor: Yeah, it was me who broke [Morleg's] arm. With a wrench. Specifically, this wrench. I am suffering from Maeglinomaniacal Maeglinophilia. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Loremaster of Annúminas
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, Gil-galad > Oropher is a bit more distant than I had in mind. Just a graham cracker.
HINT: There are no parent-child relationships
__________________
The entire plot of The Lord of the Rings could be said to turn on what Sauron didn’t know, and when he didn’t know it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Overshadowed Eagle
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: The north-west of the Old World, east of the Sea
Posts: 3,973
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Of course, there's always this: Sauron > Mouth of Sauron > Legolas. Legolas is present at the parley, though he doesn't speak. (Similarly, Sauron > One of the Nazgul > Legolas, who shot at it.) But I doubt that's what you're thinking of. ![]() hS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Loremaster of Annúminas
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
![]() ![]() ![]() |
OK, that works, but it wasn't the 6-stepper I had in mind
__________________
The entire plot of The Lord of the Rings could be said to turn on what Sauron didn’t know, and when he didn’t know it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Overshadowed Eagle
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: The north-west of the Old World, east of the Sea
Posts: 3,973
![]() ![]() |
Sauron > Galadriel > Legolas?
At Dol Guldur and Lorien, respectively. I'm not too clear on what the aim of the game in this thread is. Are we trying to find the exact solution the question-setter thought of? Are we hunting for as many answers as possible? Or are we after the shortest answer? It's all a bit vague, it's driving me batty. ![]() (I've been mostly assuming some form of 'match or beat the length specified by the setter', for the record, with the caveat that cheeky/sneaky answers may meet a reply of 'clever, but can you also do it properly?') For a more serious answer... 1. Sauron captured and tortured 2. Thrain, who was the father of 3. Thorin, who was imprisoned by 4. Thranduil, who was the father of 5. Legolas. hS |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Overshadowed Eagle
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: The north-west of the Old World, east of the Sea
Posts: 3,973
![]() ![]() |
Oh wait, you said no parent-child sets. Hrm. Let's try:
1. Sauron tortured 2. Gollum, who clearly had an encounter with 3. Grishnakh, who argued with 4. Ugluk, who duelled with 5. Eomer, who shortly thereafter met 6. Legolas. Quote:
hS |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|