![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
It was left out not by any contradiction, but rather becaus we used The Grey Annalas as main source for our text, which includes this two passages (so far apart):
Quote:
Quote:
Findegil |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Animated Skeleton
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 49
![]() |
Quote:
Repetition isn't necessarily a bad thing, quite the contrary, when placed far enough apart, it reinforces what is important, not just to the reader but to the sub-creator. Last edited by Elvellon; 10-05-2023 at 12:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
NA-EX-22.4: I think we are in agreement in this case.
Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tol Morwen
Posts: 375
![]() |
Is there a place here for the newly published rhyming couplet of the CoH (from 1931/2)?
It goes quite in depth in regards to Hurin's final stand - here's a portion of it, since I'm unsure of posting the whole thing here (it's 171 lines long): Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
I think yes. It can not go in unchanged, but that does not mean it shouldn't be used at all. E.g. the dart killing Huor does later pierce his eye and not his haert.
Raspectfuly Findegil |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|