![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
BL-SL-03:
Quote:
BL-RG-00.7: I searched for the discussion about 'magic', but could not find it. I think now that the discussion was done in a phase of the project with not many participants, but I am not sure of that. But I can asure you that Patrick Curry's opinion played no part in that discussion at all. The Letter you quoted and the refelctions of Galadriel where considered. Anyhow, after that discussion, I as the keeper of the texts, did go through all texts and introduced the changes (when the reference was to elvish craft) without farther discussion of each occurence. Therefore I appreciate when you (or anybody else) finds such places where these regular changes are problematic for any reason. In this special case I, after farther refelction could even agree to keep magic, since we most probably speak about a work crafted by dwarfish masons and we did allow magic to stand in other cases of dwarfish craft. But nonetheless as they had elvish help and the help of Melian in crafting the halls of Menegroth, I would rather replace it. I like your new suggestion of {in magic}[so crafted]. Aiwendil, is that okay for you as well? BL-RG-08.5: I did understood your use of doom well enough. I just find it a bit broad. But if you and Aiwendil are okay with it, we can take it. BL-EX-10: Okay, as I said, I am far from beeing in expert in ryhming. If 'seek'-'indded' id not good your lines wih 'seek'-'reek' are totally okay for me. BL-EX-10.5: Well, as a none native speaker syllables and stress counting doesn't seemed to be that easy for me. For the first line your repetition of 'went' works fine for me. Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
On the subject of the provenance of the texts, I agree with Findegil.
BL-RG-00.7: I don’t really agree that “magic” must be purely negative in its connotations. I’m not sure about “by masons”, though. The imagery in the poem is one of a forest of real trees being petrified, turned to stone. Yes, in reality they were carved by masons, but what the poem is saying is that they are like towers of an enchanted wood, made fast by magic. “So crafted fast forever bound” doesn’t work for me, either; I’m not quite sure how it fits grammatically, and again it loses the point of the imagery, which is of a forest having been turned to stone. BL-RG-08.5: I guess I can live with the spark/dark solution, though again, I also think that omitting the lines as we had earlier decided is fine. BL-SL-03: I agree with Findegil here. I’d prefer to omit the couplet, unless a different solution can be found. The “grand/command” solution doesn’t work for me, I’m afraid. “Grand” is not the appropriate word here. BL-EX-10: I’m not wholly convinced by either of these proposals. First of all, I’m not sure what you mean, Elvellon, by “putting ‘Celegorm the fell’ and ‘sight that is given’ back in Finrod’s mouth. In the version previously adopted, both of these phrases are direct quotes from Finrod. However, your first couplet is an improvement over mine in terms of meter. I’m not sure about the “But lastly”, though. I think a slight improvement over your lines would be: Quote:
I’m not sure about “from the reek”. I mean, yes, maybe it’s true that Angband is filled with noxious fumes, but since this hasn’t been brought up, it seems an odd way to refer to it. I recognize that “’neath the triple peak” is also clunky, but at least “triple peak” is a clear reference to Thangorodrim. Findegil’s version tries to avoid this, but “seek” and “indeed” fail to rhyme. I don’t understand why you change “shall” to “will” in these lines: Quote:
Finally, I think the last line, “to another the bride-price of Luthien” is also too long. I will try to take another crack at these lines tonight, but at least my earlier proposal could be slightly revised: Quote:
BL-RG-10.5: I’m afraid these lines don’t work for me. The “would go/follow” rhyme is very awkward, and the curse doesn’t lay “therein” but rather “thereon”. Also, the line “Celebrimbor rose and disclaimed” is a little metrically awkward. Let me think about these lines; I agree it would be nice to be able to include Celebrimbor’s renunciation here. Apologies if I'm being a bit difficult about some of these lines, but I really do feel that we should be very careful about messing with Tolkien's verse, and I would generally rather omit some lines than have our amateurish poesy stick out line a sore thumb. Edited to add: Sorry, I started writing this post before the last two posts from Findegil and Elvellon, but I've edited to add my thoughts on additional proposals from them. Last edited by Aiwendil; 10-06-2023 at 08:32 AM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||||||||||
|
Animated Skeleton
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 49
![]() |
Quote:
BL-RG-00.7: I agree, which is why I think "by magic fast for ever bound" is really best here. BL-RG-08.5: Omitting is best, since a solution hasn't been found that everyone is happy with. BL-EX-10: Quote:
Quote:
For comparison, in §194 of the Grey Annals, Finrod says: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||||
|
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
BL-EX-10:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If the rhyme using "reek" is strongly preferred to "triple peak", we might make it a little clearer: Quote:
Quote:
So, overall, I think I prefer my version above. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
Animated Skeleton
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 49
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And he did use 10 syllables every so often (not an exhaustive list):
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
BL-RG-00.7: Okay, since the ‘like’ in the line before makes this a figurative description and a petrified wood (living trees being stopped from fulfilling their natural grows) has exactly that subtle touch of evil Tolkien saw and laid into Galadriels mouth, I agree that ‘magic’ can stand here.
BL-RG-08.5: Okay, ‘dark’-spark’ solution it will be than. (Since the restoration of lines will call for renumbering, which is quite an amount of work, I will only take up that task, when all active members agree that we are done with ‘Beren and Lúthien’. BL-SL-03: What about this: Quote:
BL-RG-22: Seems we are all in agreement here. BL-RG-10.5: I tried my hand at avoiding ‘would go’-‘follow’, and what if we avoid the curse here: Quote:
Findegil |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|