![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Loremaster of Annśminas
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
![]() ![]() ![]() |
And then this:
"He [Haldude/Sauron] encounters some common folk, one of whom is unaccountably capable of articulate profundities almost as if he were speaking as a Californian scriptwriter with only a hazy sense of how to speak in old-fashioned rhetorical tropes based off half reading the Canterbury Tales and a few works of Shakespeare and Dickens in college" Ach! The stupid! It freezes! It burns! It was twisted by nassty filthy moronses! Take it off us!
__________________
The entire plot of The Lord of the Rings could be said to turn on what Sauron didnt know, and when he didnt know it. Last edited by William Cloud Hicklin; 08-30-2024 at 08:39 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Laconic Loreman
|
Episode 3 is less engaging than Episodes 1 and 2, but there's definitely been a stronger start to Season 2 than Season 1.
Prosthetics and costumes have improved (Cirdan's hair puts all the other Elves hair to shame). The Harfoot characters have dropped their inconsistent, out of place accents. Plus, I thought having their walking song be the key to finding the correct path was a clever invention. I didn't care for the Halbrand character in Season 1. I expected the "grand" reveal that he was Sauron, but I thought he was a weak villain. I'm pleased that Charlie Vickers has stepped it up as Annatar though. He's really playing into the fact of Sauron being a master manipulator and not this hulking, uber-mace wielding smasher of armies that PJ's prologue depicts. Overall, the season has started in a good direction. It's been more imaginative, bolder, and the plot has a better flow than the slog that Season 1 was.
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Wight
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Treading the Narrow Way
Posts: 198
![]() |
To start with, I agree that this season is an improvement upon the first season.
But I dislike it so very much. It totally desecrates the lore. And it blatantly copies Peter Jackson's movies, down to the very filming shots and styles, from the copy-paste of Brego the super-horse, to the "And I'm coming with you!" surprise appearance moment of Poppy/Samwise Gamshe, Not-Saruman, and the list goes on, but with none of the talent for story-telling. There are *many* plot-points balancing haphazardly on unexplained coincidences and unplausible circumstances.
__________________
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Wight
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Treading the Narrow Way
Posts: 198
![]() |
When Isildur (shockingly) turned out to have survived after all and begin to have his own thread in the show, I realized how much I would have appreciated seeing Isildur in a series, done properly. But alas, I do not expect to have my hopes fulfilled in The Rings of Power.
__________________
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Laconic Loreman
|
Quote:
. And somehow, he turns up captured in a spider web.
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Wight
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Treading the Narrow Way
Posts: 198
![]() |
Quote:
Isildur should certainly be one of their strongest characters and at the forefront of the plot, rather than the role he has been given as almost a second-thought (though, in fairness, perhaps they intend greater things in the later seasons- if they get that far). I tried to like Theo and all that his plot entailed, but really it's quite unlikable. He's got too much rebellious, "emo/goth" child in his character, to the point of vague annoyance, rather than a real interest in his part in the plot. And, absolutely, that "plot-twist" of having Isildur assumed dead was absurd. It's as though they are appealling to people who have never read the books, and thus might not realize that Isildur does, in fact, live. They simply tack on "The Lord of the Rings" to the title in hopes of luring in the masses of casual movie-watchers who enjoy Peter Jackson's films, while in reality their creation is nothing like the movies, much less Tolkien's writings. And, after all's said and done, they've created a show that most lore-purists hate, for obvious reasons, and a show that many casual seekers of entertainment lack interest in for continuity errors, a stretched plot, dreadful writing, and cheap copying of the films. Not to mention the countless bits of lore in the form of "name-dropping" that can only be understood and appreciated by those who have read the books, which make the non-reader audience feel as though they are in a room with people discussing things using big words that they don't understand.
__________________
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|